Democracy is dying and "both sides" believe the other is the "enemy".
It's going to get bloody, folks.
11–20 of 844 posts
Democracy is dying and "both sides" believe the other is the "enemy".
It's going to get bloody, folks.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Crichton#GellMannAmnes...
Yes --- and the biggest offenders are the ones who regularly complain about it.
Citation needed.
Because, to first approximation, this is true. Every organization, every person has their own biases and agenda. I'm not sure why Americans believe that objectivity in news reporting is even possible. Other countries don't seem to have as much of an issue with this, since you typically have news sources that are either owned directly by the government or are published by political parties.
Even Seymour Hersh has been smeared to discredit him now he dared speak against the establishment.
It is not journalists' role to be a mouthpiece for the government, but to challenge it.
Highly relevant: https://AstralCodexTen.substack.com/p/the-media-very-rarely-...
> The point is: the media rarely lies explicitly and directly. Reporters rarely say specific things they know to be false. When the media misinforms people, it does so by misinterpreting things, excluding context, or signal-boosting some events while ignoring others, not by participating in some bright-line category called “misinformation”. I don't think it's true (why would it be), and even it is true, it is stupid…
you’re on HN. surely you have the imagination.
edit: apparently not
I don't know about the "deliberate" part, but on "mislead" this is good news. Gell-Mann amnesia[1] is wearing off. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Crichton#GellMannAmnes...
Rare to be able to factcheck an article without leaving the page and disprove it from its own content, but the lies are not rare.
https://www.newsweek.com/video-mike-rogers-held-back-he-lung...
We never discussed it in the context of new media but it feels quite relevant.
Better headline: half of Americans don't know that (many) news organizations deliberately mislead them.
I’ve worked in a newsroom. The idea that puppet masters thousands of miles away are controlling things is absurd to the point of hilarity.
Yes, Rupert Murdoch, etc. But it’s all emergent behavior. There is no master plan. These organizations are not well run enough to deliberately get stories out in time, let alone conspire to mislead.