Sanders calls for a lot and never delivers. I wouldn’t hold your breath teachers.
The people of Vermont love him though.
151–160 of 410 posts
Sanders calls for a lot and never delivers. I wouldn’t hold your breath teachers.
The people of Vermont love him though.
If that is included in a minimum salary of $60,000, I would support it. If it isn’t, I would not, and would support private schooling instead.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you realize how dystopian that is?
Yes, I too work 12 months of the year.
Legitimate question, do you not see the difference?
not sure this really fix any problem. $60k good salary in arkansas maybe. if you in expensive city..not go very far. have kids in public america school system. government spending money in my opinion uncompetitive and wasteful. but public education must all support. it still good in america. national minimum salary ok but need states or cities to tune to living cost. $60k only work maybe in central us.. cheaper state…
It'd help here in Colorado which is both a relatively HCOL area and a place that pays our teachers peanuts. I know teachers here that get less that $60k/yr as it is.
The minimum starting salary for a teacher in Chicago is $60,000 (cost of living adjusted), the highest in the country. It hasn't solved Chicago Public Schools' problems. Source: https://wirepoints.org/chicago-teachers-are-paid-some-of-the...
> It hasn't solved Chicago Public Schools' problems. sure but it probably has solved many financial problems for Chicago teachers, which is a good enough reason to implement a tool like this.
Maybe that’s the stated reason, and maybe it’s used to drum up political support, but it’s never the real reason.
The minimum starting salary for a teacher in Chicago is $60,000 (cost of living adjusted), the highest in the country. It hasn't solved Chicago Public Schools' problems. Source: https://wirepoints.org/chicago-teachers-are-paid-some-of-the...
Is the ratio of teachers to student relevant as well? And perhaps other factors?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It hasn't solved Chicago Public Schools' problems. sure but it probably has solved many financial problems for Chicago teachers, which is a good enough reason to implement a tool like this.
At the cost of more financial problems for taxpayers? How do you balance those two?
The only way teachers would ever be able to make a lot of money is if some metrics apparatus was created by the United States and income outcomes were traced back to individual schools and teachers in said schools got some portion of that as part of their salary. Of course, the USA would have to bootstrap the first "cohort" of this. Otherwise, the point is simple - good teachers don't get paid more, because there's n…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Supply and demand, like always. The market cares not one bit about what someone “should” be paid, it cares about the price where no one is left willing to do the same job for less. If you want teachers to be paid more, increase the requirements to be a teacher. I’m a proponent of requiring at least n years experience in real world work, plus education in a hard science or trade.
> Supply and demand, like always. Not everything follows the rules of capitalism, especially when public school teachers are paid by the government. There are giant teacher shortages across many locales in the US, so according to you we should see skyrocketing teacher pay, but that hasn't happened (pay has gone up in some locales but nowhere near the amount needed to fix teacher shortages).