Live data from Hacker News

Military shoots down another high-altitude object, over Lake Huron: officials

abcnews.go.com

591–593 of 593 posts

Re: Military shoots down another high-altitude object, over Lake Huron: officials

#591

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> China's [ASAT test]( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fengyun ) which has been the worst in history. Check your source, per your cited wiki page: > The shootdown, and the subsequent creation of a record-setting amount of in-orbit debris, drew serious international criticism.[15][16][17][18][19] The shootdown refers to the ASAT test on FY-1C For the reference [15] http://www.centerforspace.com/asat/ , cannot be opened,…

Reference 16 is cited because of the following paragraph: > The single biggest debris-generating event happened in 2007, when China used a missile to destroy one of its own satellites. The explosion created more than 3,000 trackable objects and an estimated 150,000 debris particles. Also, comparing the BBC to Fox on coverage of anything is disingenuous at best. Even if they have clear biases, the BBC is one of the mo…

> Even if they have clear biases, the BBC is one of the most respected news outlets in the world, and have been very rarely just lying about facts.

Are your brain's logical circuit working correctly?

Re: Military shoots down another high-altitude object, over Lake Huron: officials

#592
post #589

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Give at least one source, I've never heard of anything like it.

I thought I was remembering a single specific event, but maybe not. Plenty of sources none the less. https://www.independent.co.uk/space/russia-china-attack-us-s... This one might have been the one I misremembered, but it doesn't seem like quite the right one: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https:/... I think more likely I just upgraded "jammed" to destroyed - its not like I was imagining an exp…

Thank you for a great reply!

Re: Military shoots down another high-altitude object, over Lake Huron: officials

#593

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IIRC originally Elon wanted to land a greenhouse on Mars, not people from the very start.

Establishing a massive functioning greenhouse on Mars, before sending people, still seems like a smart idea to me. In fact, setting up as much automation as possible, pre-people, would be a good way to establish the human safety of Mars flights. As well as supercharging the productivity and quality of life of the first Marsers when they finally do arrive.

IIRC the very original plan was a small glasshouse with a camera. But your idea sounds good as well. :)
Post reply on HN