11–20 of 425 posts
I guess at this point I should believe the points made in the documentary. The reaction to it speaks volumes.
"When you tear out a man’s tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you’re only telling the world that you fear what he might say."
Edit: Apologies, should have been in response to the sibling, rather than the parent.
'Following the searches, Gaurav Bhatia, a spokesperson from Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), described the BBC as the “most corrupt organisation in the world”.' Which just about sums up the independence of the process.
[flagged]
If you're interested, you can get it (legally) in the UK here: [1] and searching for "India: the Modi question" will most likely provide it elsewhere.
[1] https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p0dkb144/india-the-mod...
Strange.
'Following the searches, Gaurav Bhatia, a spokesperson from Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), described the BBC as the “most corrupt organisation in the world”.' Which just about sums up the independence of the process.
[flagged]
Come on.
It’s worth noting that many companies such as Apple are diversifying from China due to the overreach of the political powers, but they’re moving over to India where the same thing is happening. Strange.
This is how freedom of speech dies, bit by bit......
'Following the searches, Gaurav Bhatia, a spokesperson from Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), described the BBC as the “most corrupt organisation in the world”.' Which just about sums up the independence of the process.
[flagged]
'Following the searches, Gaurav Bhatia, a spokesperson from Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), described the BBC as the “most corrupt organisation in the world”.' Which just about sums up the independence of the process.
[flagged]
The leader of the BBC is quite obviously corrupt and placed in his position in a highly corrupt process.
Which has absolutely no bearing on the Indian government’s response to what was a fairly ordinary piece of media.