>I suspect a single machine could put out 71M HTTP requests/second without too much difficulty
PacketsPerSecond=TransferRate(bytes/second)/PacketSize(bytes/packet)
https://community.arubanetworks.com/community-home/digestvie...
A single 24port switch with 1Gbps ports would see 48Gbps so with 64byte packets would see 71M packets, 1518byte packets would drop to 3.9M packets.
If you are in the business of being the main auditor of your activities, water companies here in the UK being an example, news organisations as another, then does one ever find a problem with one's work?
I've had DDOS on my systems before, and how it took my firewall out was simply increasing the number of requests the firewall had to handle using a SYN flood.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SYN_flood
Most firewalls are fixed and not adaptive, so a bit of low hanging fruit could be had by firewall systems that can adapt to SYN floods, like shortening the time the handshake process stays in memory, choosing to dump all that dont complete within a short period of time, choosing to dump those from ip address blocks linked to country's or regions your dont normally trade with. There are so many ways to handle these situations, but not all firewalls and switches provide the facilities that are needed.
Hackers will exploit default configurations and industry standard best practices, including RFC's.
During one of my lets see what happens if I push this metaphoric button exercises, I was tracing those random packets that appear at firewalls and I happened to have picked one which tracerouted back to a French IP.
What was interesting and consistent with behaviour I've seen in the 90's with dead submarine internet connections at the New York exchange, was the trace route delivered its hop data until I crossed the English channel at which point a packet killed the machine, forcing the mains to be pulled as the machine went totally unresponsive.
It makes me think the UK internet is like some giant virtual dome like the one seen in the film The Truman Show.