First there were the journalists, who fully researched their material from first-hand sources. Then there were the bloggers who, without leaving their armchair, wrote opinion pieces based on whatever the journalists had written. Now there is AI, which apes the non-experience of the bloggers. Truly we are now living in a simulation of a simulation.
If the example of journalists is anything to go by, soon both journalists and bloggers will produce content using exclusively AI.
Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
61–70 of 94 posts
Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
If the example of journalists is anything to go by, soon both journalists and bloggers will produce content using exclusively AI.
$ echo "write me a blog post from the perspective of a young phd in AI on how fears of AI and machine learning are vastly overblown. include fake but obscure and outrageous examples of when AI was able to save lives and downplay real examples of when AI got it wrong. contrast the promise of AI getting it right with software bugs resulting in fatalities. argue this will allow the average company to hire fewer workers…
s/sendmail/chatgpt|sendmail/
Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
#63Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
The "dead internet" is here, and unfortunately there's no going back
Meanwhile all the script kiddies on this forum: "ChatGPT go brrrrr" I am growing more and more bitter everyday by how many of us are rushing to build a deader Internet. Every "Show HN: I have made ChatGPT even easier to use" is a stark reminder that either I am growing old and pessimistic, or for the first time in my career I am disgusted at the direction software engineering is going. Appalled by the lack of ethics…
Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
#65Either you're getting a different result due to whatever config you're getting served or they fixed it already because I'm getting 0.
Same here, though it's giving an incorrect number (650m) for pluto, apparently sourced from a now deleted page at https://www.nationstates.net/nation=the_kingdom_of_pluto .
Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
The "dead internet" is here, and unfortunately there's no going back
Meanwhile all the script kiddies on this forum: "ChatGPT go brrrrr" I am growing more and more bitter everyday by how many of us are rushing to build a deader Internet. Every "Show HN: I have made ChatGPT even easier to use" is a stark reminder that either I am growing old and pessimistic, or for the first time in my career I am disgusted at the direction software engineering is going. Appalled by the lack of ethics…
Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
#67This screenshot does not show an AI generated answer, GPT or otherwise. It's just a normal Bing infobox that Bing has had for ever. Google has them too. It's quoting a website which it does not realize is fiction.
Zero. No humans have yet reached the planet Mars. Zero.
Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
#68First there were the journalists, who fully researched their material from first-hand sources. Then there were the bloggers who, without leaving their armchair, wrote opinion pieces based on whatever the journalists had written. Now there is AI, which apes the non-experience of the bloggers. Truly we are now living in a simulation of a simulation.
AI doesn’t have the capacity to think critically.
Many current "journalists" have this issue too.
Whether it's a feature or a bug depends on whether you agree with their output.
Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
#69What is more interesting for me, is why anyone is surprised that an algorithm based on choosing a statistically probably combination of words, trained with whatever random crap appears on the internet, happens to choose some combination that makes grammatical sense, but doesn't match reality.
Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
#70This screenshot does not show an AI generated answer, GPT or otherwise. It's just a normal Bing infobox that Bing has had for ever. Google has them too. It's quoting a website which it does not realize is fiction.
For the record, this is what Google responds with when you ask it about the population of Mars: Zero. No humans have yet reached the planet Mars. Zero.
https://www.google.com/search?q=population+of+alpha+centauri