This screenshot does not show an AI generated answer, GPT or otherwise.
It's just a normal Bing infobox that Bing has had for ever. Google has them too. It's quoting a website which it does not realize is fiction.
Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
31–40 of 94 posts
Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
#32This screenshot does not show an AI generated answer, GPT or otherwise. It's just a normal Bing infobox that Bing has had for ever. Google has them too. It's quoting a website which it does not realize is fiction.
[deleted]
Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
#33Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
#34I guess the way forward will have to be giving the neutral network access to a curated database of facts as suggested by Stephen Wolfram: https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/01/wolframalpha-as-...
The internet is simply too full of nonsense.
Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
#35First there were the journalists, who fully researched their material from first-hand sources. Then there were the bloggers who, without leaving their armchair, wrote opinion pieces based on whatever the journalists had written. Now there is AI, which apes the non-experience of the bloggers. Truly we are now living in a simulation of a simulation.
online media were always hyperreal. baudrillard saw this like 30+ years ago.
Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
#36First there were the journalists, who fully researched their material from first-hand sources. Then there were the bloggers who, without leaving their armchair, wrote opinion pieces based on whatever the journalists had written. Now there is AI, which apes the non-experience of the bloggers. Truly we are now living in a simulation of a simulation.
AI doesn’t have the capacity to think critically.
it really does tho
https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903
just in a limited capacity
Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
#37First there were the journalists, who fully researched their material from first-hand sources. Then there were the bloggers who, without leaving their armchair, wrote opinion pieces based on whatever the journalists had written. Now there is AI, which apes the non-experience of the bloggers. Truly we are now living in a simulation of a simulation.
AI doesn’t have the capacity to think critically.
Over the years I have worked in many universities. Many of the so-called critical thinkers I meet are anything but. Their writings echo pre-approved wisdoms and take a generally template-driven approach to all matters. I only need to read one of their papers to know with fair certainty what opinion they will hold on any given subject.
Thinking about it, this makes them sound very similar to AIs [wry smile emoji].
Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
#38TIL Pluto has ~1B plutoans!
Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
#39First there were the journalists, who fully researched their material from first-hand sources. Then there were the bloggers who, without leaving their armchair, wrote opinion pieces based on whatever the journalists had written. Now there is AI, which apes the non-experience of the bloggers. Truly we are now living in a simulation of a simulation.
You gotta be more careful around these parts with simulation jokes. There's people who'll take it as gospel.
Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer
#40First there were the journalists, who fully researched their material from first-hand sources. Then there were the bloggers who, without leaving their armchair, wrote opinion pieces based on whatever the journalists had written. Now there is AI, which apes the non-experience of the bloggers. Truly we are now living in a simulation of a simulation.
AI doesn’t have the capacity to think critically.
[deleted]