War and subsidies have turbocharged the green transition
1–10 of 231 posts
Re: War and subsidies have turbocharged the green transition
#2War and subsidies have turbocharged the LNG transition.
There, I fixed the title.
Re: War and subsidies have turbocharged the green transition
#3War and subsidies have turbocharged the LNG transition. There, I fixed the title.
[deleted]
Re: War and subsidies have turbocharged the green transition
#4War and subsidies have turbocharged the LNG transition. There, I fixed the title.
The misdirection is so bald-faced and shameless.
Re: War and subsidies have turbocharged the green transition
#5How convenient! Why stop there, might as well go to the Stone Age, if the green transition does not get us there, then global war surely will. /s
Re: War and subsidies have turbocharged the green transition
#6[flagged]
Re: War and subsidies have turbocharged the green transition
#7Can anyone taking issue with this article please address the substance of it?
Re: War and subsidies have turbocharged the green transition
#8Great, we don’t have to change anything then! Thanks, capitalism!
Re: War and subsidies have turbocharged the green transition
#9War and subsidies have turbocharged the LNG transition. There, I fixed the title.
Natural gas compliments renewables until battery storage and renewables overproduction pushes out natural gas. It also produces smaller amounts of CO2 per unit of electricity produced versus coal.
Recently, there was an HN thread about large amounts of UK wind curtailment. The largest battery storage system in Europe just went live to provide grid services that’ll negate the need for natural gas to provide those services, while reducing wind curtailment.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34358795
https://www.energy-storage.news/europes-largest-transmission...
Re: War and subsidies have turbocharged the green transition
#10[flagged]
Any opinions on the actual article?