Live data from Hacker News

700k car insurance prices show why you can't insure a Kia

coveragecat.com

1–8 of 8 posts

Re: 700k car insurance prices show why you can't insure a Kia

#3
I guess the context is lost for Europeans. Apparently electronic immobilizers are not required by law in the US, so Kia and Hyundai did not include one on many models, resulting in higher theft rates.

https://www.thedrive.com/news/kia-and-hyundai-sued-by-city-o...

Now apparently because insurance rates are regulated, some insurers now refuse to insure certain Kia models.

Re: 700k car insurance prices show why you can't insure a Kia

#7

I guess the context is lost for Europeans. Apparently electronic immobilizers are not required by law in the US, so Kia and Hyundai did not include one on many models, resulting in higher theft rates. https://www.thedrive.com/news/kia-and-hyundai-sued-by-city-o... Now apparently because insurance rates are regulated, some insurers now refuse to insure certain Kia models.

For context, immobilisers have been mandatory (on new cars) in England and Wales since October 1998. Possibly some exemptions for specialist cars, like a Caterham.

Re: 700k car insurance prices show why you can't insure a Kia

#8
post #7

I guess the context is lost for Europeans. Apparently electronic immobilizers are not required by law in the US, so Kia and Hyundai did not include one on many models, resulting in higher theft rates. https://www.thedrive.com/news/kia-and-hyundai-sued-by-city-o... Now apparently because insurance rates are regulated, some insurers now refuse to insure certain Kia models.

For context, immobilisers have been mandatory (on new cars) in England and Wales since October 1998. Possibly some exemptions for specialist cars, like a Caterham.

Thats because UK had its KIA moment in the eighties/nineties with cars like Ford Sierra [Cosworth] :)