Live data from Hacker News

Why does the SARS-Cov2 genome end in aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa? (2020)

bioinformatics.stackexchange.com

81–90 of 125 posts

Re: Why does the SARS-Cov2 genome end in aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa? (2020)

#82
post #51

The top answer at the link explains it best: Good observation! The 3' poly(A) tail is actually a very common feature of positive-strand RNA viruses, including coronaviruses and picornaviruses. For coronaviruses in particular, we know that the poly(A) tail is required for replication, functioning in conjunction with the 3' untranslated region (UTR) as a cis-acting signal for negative strand synthesis and attachment to…

Can a drug target that sequence specifically?

Not if it's common to both viruses and human cells you can't.

Re: Why does the SARS-Cov2 genome end in aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa? (2020)

#83
post #16

Maybe the scientist who made it died before he finished? ATTACGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA……

Look, if he died while engineering a virus, he wouldn't bother to code "AAAAAAA" he'd just say it!

Perhaps they were dictating?

Re: Why does the SARS-Cov2 genome end in aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa? (2020)

#87

The top answer at the link explains it best: Good observation! The 3' poly(A) tail is actually a very common feature of positive-strand RNA viruses, including coronaviruses and picornaviruses. For coronaviruses in particular, we know that the poly(A) tail is required for replication, functioning in conjunction with the 3' untranslated region (UTR) as a cis-acting signal for negative strand synthesis and attachment to…

Interestingly, vaccines also have a long repeating sequence at the end. It provides molecular stability.

Found a wikipedia article describing it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyadenylation

Re: Why does the SARS-Cov2 genome end in aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa? (2020)

#88
Very interesting. I first wondered how nature can randomly generate such a pattern, and then realized we are just falling for our "built in" pattern recognition: it would feel much more "natural" for the stop sequence to be the encoding of some specific protein without any clearly recognizable pattern... But it would actually be more unlikely to appear/survive mutation than "any long-enough sequence of A".

I also like how it is established that this has an effect on replication, but that as far as I understand we do not understand the underlying process. Humbling.

Post reply on HN