Live data from Hacker News

U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana

twitter.com

21–30 of 51 posts

Re: U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana

#21

Anyone else feel like we aren't getting the whole story here?

I don’t understand what’s so interesting about a spy balloon anyway. Doesn’t China already have satellites in orbit able to take high resolution pictures anywhere in the country anyway?

11km is a lot closer than 350km. closer, and a lot less air in the way.

Re: U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana

#22
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, it's a big distraction from other, non-balloon important world events that we should be focusing on, of which there are many. These balloons taking over the news cycle for days on end eats into peoples precious attention spans. Suddenly balloons are the hottest thing to focus on right now though.

https://newsasfacts.com/ Even my most unbiased source of news can’t come up with much distraction-worthy news outside of a small kerfuffle in the Philippines.

Is this your site? It looks neat

Re: U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana

#23

Anyone else feel like we aren't getting the whole story here?

What evidence do we have that these balloons are of terrestrial origin, other than Occam’s razor? It could be Venusians, who have experience building lighter than aircraft for their floating cities. Other than how wildly improbable it is, the alien theory still makes more sense than the CCP thinking balloon espionage is a pretty neat idea.

Re: U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana

#24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://newsasfacts.com/ Even my most unbiased source of news can’t come up with much distraction-worthy news outside of a small kerfuffle in the Philippines.

Is this your site? It looks neat

I wish lol. Someone smarter than me posted it here and I’ve been using it ever since.

Re: U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana

#25
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, it's a big distraction from other, non-balloon important world events that we should be focusing on, of which there are many. These balloons taking over the news cycle for days on end eats into peoples precious attention spans. Suddenly balloons are the hottest thing to focus on right now though.

https://newsasfacts.com/ Even my most unbiased source of news can’t come up with much distraction-worthy news outside of a small kerfuffle in the Philippines.

I’m surprised it doesn’t have anything about Turkey’s earthquake response. Things happened today.

Re: U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana

#26
post #17

Anyone else feel like we aren't getting the whole story here?

Yeah, it's a big distraction from other, non-balloon important world events that we should be focusing on, of which there are many. These balloons taking over the news cycle for days on end eats into peoples precious attention spans. Suddenly balloons are the hottest thing to focus on right now though.

Right, what are the Kardashians up to since all of the balloon activity? We can't forget the important stuff. Or the 18 versions of RHO...

Re: U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana

#27

Anyone else feel like we aren't getting the whole story here?

I don’t understand what’s so interesting about a spy balloon anyway. Doesn’t China already have satellites in orbit able to take high resolution pictures anywhere in the country anyway?

about the balloons themselves? Nothing. But how the US responds, how much they tolerate, that's all important signals. A lot of geopolitical competition is about poking and seeing what you can get away with.

Re: U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana

#28
post #16
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> jumping with both feet to conclusions What conclusions? I'd actually like to see some conclusions. So far all we have is 'objects'.

"Reported" objects. On a complex radar system which has filters in the process of being re-tuned, because of concern things have been missed but now, there are more false positives: radar is complicated and weather, dust, floating metallised party balloons, insects, migrating birds can generate signals.

>migrating birds can generate signals.

Great, so you're setting up Pearl Harbor 2.0

Re: U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana

#29
post #18
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is a member of Congress commenting and not the DOD or the Governor of Montana? Is someone spilling classified information to show off?

It's worth noting that in the US government hierarchy, the United States Congress is superior to the Department of Defense. Why? Because they (both House and Senate) write the laws stating who and what the DoD is, the House funds the DoD, and the Senate confirms appointments of officers. Specifically with regards to Matt Rosendale, he is a Representative from Montana. He is in a position where he can demand (and will…

That is not how the chain of command works for the military. The president is the commander in chief, and senators do not report to him.

Re: U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana

#30
post #29
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's worth noting that in the US government hierarchy, the United States Congress is superior to the Department of Defense. Why? Because they (both House and Senate) write the laws stating who and what the DoD is, the House funds the DoD, and the Senate confirms appointments of officers. Specifically with regards to Matt Rosendale, he is a Representative from Montana. He is in a position where he can demand (and will…

That is not how the chain of command works for the military. The president is the commander in chief, and senators do not report to him.

Ultimately their paramount allegiance is to the Constitution and the people of the United States. This can supercede the chain of command when Commander-in-chief places orders contravened by the People.

Congress performs oversight of the military and sets budgets, so they're briefed on operations like this which have some outsized political impact. It doesn't seem to me like these things should be a big deal but the rest of the people in the US seem to act like it is, so Congress is naturally very interested.

Post reply on HN