Live data from Hacker News

US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada

bbc.com

291–300 of 526 posts

Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada

#293
post #253

UFOs are just spy drones with sensor jammers and detectors that are designed to look strange and unnerving to pilots so they will scope them out. Pilots are trained NOT to go by them or engage with them for fear of secrets leaking.

> UFOs are just spy drones with sensor jammers and detectors… They can be, but they can also be weapons. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fu-Go_balloon_bomb

UFOs can be anything, by definition.

The interesting thing here is the social phenomenon of suddenly shooting them all down.

Coincidentally, I was just reading about MH17.

Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada

#295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sounds like a shiny balloon to me.

Funny, they confirmed it was unmanned but they refuse to confirm whether its a balloon. Bit weird don't you think?

Balloons are treated differently under the Chicago convention. There’s a little bit more leeway for balloons when it comes to overflights on sovereign territory.

Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada

#298
post #293

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> UFOs are just spy drones with sensor jammers and detectors… They can be, but they can also be weapons. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fu-Go_balloon_bomb

UFOs can be anything, by definition. The interesting thing here is the social phenomenon of suddenly shooting them all down. Coincidentally, I was just reading about MH17.

And by the time you know what they are, by definition, they're not UFOs anymore.

Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada

#299

Is there a plausible explanation as to why the US government has not announced objects 2 & 3 are balloons, if they are balloons? They call them "objects", yet must know what they are. They wouldn't randomly missile unknowns. If it's for reasons of secrecy, why announce it at all? The second one was in the middle of nowhere, it could easily have been ignored, or dismissed as a military exercise if anyone had made a fu…

They are now saying they don't know how it was staying airborne (no visible balloon or propulsion) and when they approached to observe it interfered with instrumentation. Source: https://twitter.com/ZaidSabah/status/1624527081026486274

"They" are definitely not speaking for the US government.

Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada

#300

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm convinced that's why the balloons haven't been shot down in the past. Learning our detection abilities is probably way more important for China than anything they would be able to take a picture of.

We spent multiple days soaking information from them and monitoring them from high altitude. We almost definitely know more about them than they know about our defenses. The immediate assumption that the Americans are being snookered comes off like reflexive anti-Americanism.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN