Closing down Montana airspace, two UFOs shotdown toxic train derailment in OH.... What a weekend.
US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada
261–270 of 526 posts
Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada
#262"Some pilots said the object “interfered with their sensors” on the planes" "Some pilots also claimed to have seen no identifiable propulsion on the object, and could not explain how it was staying in the air, despite the object cruising at an altitude of 40,000 feet." https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/11/politics/unidentified-object-... "It was described as "cylindrical and silver-ish gray" and seemed to be floating, a U.…
Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada
#263I wonder if they're trying to figure out what we can detect and we're giving them all the information they need by publically shooting these down.
I'm convinced that's why the balloons haven't been shot down in the past. Learning our detection abilities is probably way more important for China than anything they would be able to take a picture of.
Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada
#264Earlier quoted context omitted.
Funny, they confirmed it was unmanned but they refuse to confirm whether its a balloon. Bit weird don't you think?
"well, technically we recovered an alien so it was 'unmanned' because there were no men onboard"...some defense department lawyer
Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada
#265Earlier quoted context omitted.
Says a lot about the RCAF though: they can't even defend their territory properly.
Did you even read the article? > The Pentagon said the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) detected the object over Alaska late Friday evening. U.S. fighter jets from Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, monitored the object as it crossed over into Canadian airspace, where Canadian CF-18 and CP-140 aircraft joined the formation.
Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada
#266Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada
#267"Some pilots said the object “interfered with their sensors” on the planes" "Some pilots also claimed to have seen no identifiable propulsion on the object, and could not explain how it was staying in the air, despite the object cruising at an altitude of 40,000 feet." https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/11/politics/unidentified-object-... "It was described as "cylindrical and silver-ish gray" and seemed to be floating, a U.…
Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada
#268Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm convinced that's why the balloons haven't been shot down in the past. Learning our detection abilities is probably way more important for China than anything they would be able to take a picture of.
Yeah, I don't think that's it. Detecting a balloon doesn't take any exotic technology. Now a hypersonic missile, or a stealth plane -- that would be a test. But losing one of those would be pretty expensive.
My understanding is that these UAFs are much smaller than that first Chinese balloon last week.
It probably also costs a lot more money to shoot down a balloon than it costs China to put a balloon in the air.
Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada
#269Closing down Montana airspace, two UFOs shotdown toxic train derailment in OH.... What a weekend.
Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada
#270Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm convinced that's why the balloons haven't been shot down in the past. Learning our detection abilities is probably way more important for China than anything they would be able to take a picture of.
People can see these with the naked eye (or with cameras). If our sophisticated defense systems are failing to match the naked eye... something is wrong.