Firefox made something cooler: make a page into 3d using DOM's z-index property https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/devtools-user/3d_vie...
It also didn't end up being very useful, and they removed it in 2016.
131–140 of 264 posts
Firefox made something cooler: make a page into 3d using DOM's z-index property https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/devtools-user/3d_vie...
It also didn't end up being very useful, and they removed it in 2016.
Firefox made something cooler: make a page into 3d using DOM's z-index property https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/devtools-user/3d_vie...
Firefox made something cooler: make a page into 3d using DOM's z-index property https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/devtools-user/3d_vie...
That's a completely unrelated feature, intended for web development? It also didn't end up being very useful, and they removed it in 2016.
Because SPA (Angular/React/Vue) happened. Webpages are going from handcrafted "semantic" ones to nested pile of DIVs.
Firefox made something cooler: make a page into 3d using DOM's z-index property https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/devtools-user/3d_vie...
:sadface:
Like many utilities, there are countless other ways to get to a similar result, but I personally don't want to think through exactly what tools and adjustments would be needed. So, for me, $5/month is a good value to get a task off my plate every once in a while. Thanks for making it!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a completely unrelated feature, intended for web development? It also didn't end up being very useful, and they removed it in 2016.
> It also didn't end up being very useful Because SPA (Angular/React/Vue) happened. Webpages are going from handcrafted "semantic" ones to nested pile of DIVs.
I can see how this is useful for laypeople. Those with a DIY attitude might resort to popular image editing tools. My choice would be trying to achieve this with Imagemagick. Fred Weinhaus' script http://www.fmwconcepts.com/imagemagick/skew/index.php and maybe adding a blur later.
This is a good idea to add visual novelty to images, especially plain ones.
The problem is the moat is very low: as low as 1 30-second YouTube video on using the transform tool in the case of Gimp.
Doesn't seem very defensible - but maybe if you add versioning & various other features (links for images, etc.) it could be.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
OP here. Thanks for the advice. I have been considering a few different options. Perhaps I could have a preloaded screenshot with the UI already initialised, so I immediately can show off the functionality? I don't know what is the best approach.
Yeah, I don't want to upload my data to a random website I've never heard of, just to see what the heck it does. You NEED a few examples, otherwise users will just close tab.
You sound so cool when you start a sentence with "yeah" for no grammatical reason, as though answering a question that no one asked. I bet you're really laid back and were probably smoking a blunt and exhaling a massive cloud while you typed your comment. Did you personally innovate this conversational technique?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, I don't want to upload my data to a random website I've never heard of, just to see what the heck it does. You NEED a few examples, otherwise users will just close tab.
> Yeah, You sound so cool when you start a sentence with "yeah" for no grammatical reason, as though answering a question that no one asked. I bet you're really laid back and were probably smoking a blunt and exhaling a massive cloud while you typed your comment. Did you personally innovate this conversational technique?
An ad hominem attack based on a single word and your extreme displeasure of it?