No post body was provided.
Untitled topic
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: undefined
#2That escalated quickly
Re: undefined
#3Pretty sure it’s another dumb, obviously-false moral panic article. Or maybe it’s a tongue-in-cheek essay poking fun at people who write dumb stuff like that.
But who knows? I’m on mobile and the whole thing is covered by an un-closeable popup that wants me to hire this writer who won’t let me read their presumable nonsense (or clever satire).
Re: undefined
#4Non-JS Archive [1]
[1] - https://archive.ph/V6KQj
Re: undefined
#5Pretty sure it’s another dumb, obviously-false moral panic article. Or maybe it’s a tongue-in-cheek essay poking fun at people who write dumb stuff like that. But who knows? I’m on mobile and the whole thing is covered by an un-closeable popup that wants me to hire this writer who won’t let me read their presumable nonsense (or clever satire).
The x in the upper-right corner is hard to see but it does close the pop-up. The pop-up itself does not inspire confidence.
Re: undefined
#6They appear to be talking about Japanese hosted sites, with content that is legal in Japan:
> Japan didn't even make all child porn illegal either, they only made photos and videos with real children in them illegal, computer-generated imagery of children, no matter how sexual, is not illegal in the eyes of the law. Neither are animated cartoons, drawings, or physical sex dolls that resemble children.
It takes a while for them to reveal that key fact, enough that this reads as a bit insane. Presumably any open source protocal or publishing system in use by Japanese people is going to fall under the same banner.
Re: undefined
#7Pretty sure it’s another dumb, obviously-false moral panic article. Or maybe it’s a tongue-in-cheek essay poking fun at people who write dumb stuff like that. But who knows? I’m on mobile and the whole thing is covered by an un-closeable popup that wants me to hire this writer who won’t let me read their presumable nonsense (or clever satire).
It seems more or less consistent with the usual anti-loli stuff I have seen. The only thing that really stands out is that they themselves did not redistribute the artwork that they think is CP as an example, so the writer of this one might actually be more serious than the usual twitterati.