Live data from Hacker News

Astonishingly strong US jobs report sends stocks wavering

cnn.com

201–204 of 204 posts

Re: Astonishingly strong US jobs report sends stocks wavering

#201
post #173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Living out of [only] social security is a bad joke, for a standard of living barely above just eating, sleeping and not getting sick. I contributed the max throughout my 30 years professional career, I'm fully vested, and it can barely cover anything of usable value, in these times. If one thinks that culturally / spiritually (but not religiously) could be supported by socsec, is delusional. Leaving the States is the…

Note that I said "That's supposed [emphasis added] to be what Social Security is for." The question is not what the federal government is actually doing right now (if anything) to help people affected by inflation but rather what the federal government could do to help people affected by inflation. Some people in the comments seem to be claiming that driving up interest rates is literally the only logical possibility…

I've been thinking about your comment for a few days now.

>The equation of retirement and stock market investment is a deliberate policy [. . .]

Reads to me as if investing in stocks is a negative, that has been deliberately pushed on society as a whole. I am interested to hear what an alternative would be for you. What else can I park my money in for a good enough return to ensure that I don't have to rely on the weak (and ever weakening) SS? I legitimately cannot come up with anything worthwhile.

Re: Astonishingly strong US jobs report sends stocks wavering

#202
post #173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Note that I said "That's supposed [emphasis added] to be what Social Security is for." The question is not what the federal government is actually doing right now (if anything) to help people affected by inflation but rather what the federal government could do to help people affected by inflation. Some people in the comments seem to be claiming that driving up interest rates is literally the only logical possibility…

I've been thinking about your comment for a few days now. >The equation of retirement and stock market investment is a deliberate policy [. . .] Reads to me as if investing in stocks is a negative, that has been deliberately pushed on society as a whole. I am interested to hear what an alternative would be for you. What else can I park my money in for a good enough return to ensure that I don't have to rely on the we…

> Reads to me as if investing in stocks is a negative, that has been deliberately pushed on society as a whole.

I wouldn't say it's a negative per se, I'd say that it's risky. It's only suited for those who have the time, knowledge, experience, and money to lose. The working class in general aren't experts in the stock market, nor should they be, and they certainly can't afford to lose their retirement funds. This is why I say this policy is "benefitting the speculators and financiers", who are the natural participants in the stock market.

> I don't have to rely on the weak (and ever weakening) SS?

But why is it weak and ever weakening? That's the point. It's a deliberate policy choice for the government to undermine SS.

Re: Astonishingly strong US jobs report sends stocks wavering

#203
post #200

[flagged]

Please don't do that here. Also, please stop posting flamebait and/or unsubstantive comments to HN. You've been doing it repeatedly and we eventually have to ban that sort of account. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Sorry, but I don't care if you ban my account. I have absolutely zero connections to this account or its username and would just simply create another account if it did get banned.

Re: Astonishingly strong US jobs report sends stocks wavering

#204
post #200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please don't do that here. Also, please stop posting flamebait and/or unsubstantive comments to HN. You've been doing it repeatedly and we eventually have to ban that sort of account. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Sorry, but I don't care if you ban my account. I have absolutely zero connections to this account or its username and would just simply create another account if it did get banned.

Sure, people do that. But I'd rather try to persuade you to use the site as intended. If it has value, it's worth preserving, and if it doesn't have value then I don't think you'd be here. Right?
Post reply on HN