Live data from Hacker News

Monocle: A pocket sized open-source AR device

brilliantmonocle.com

21–30 of 223 posts

Re: Monocle: A pocket sized open-source AR device

#21

I'm confused why there is no YouTube in the social media section on the site. Demo video is what I need the most to make a decision about buying a product

Found something (shows phone using some kind of app/terminal to connect to device updating firmware)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DYI3DfHPyw

Re: Monocle: A pocket sized open-source AR device

#22

Neat but (still) pricey. Not sold on the 640x480 display; it requires work to focus you eye to such a short distance and due to macular degeneration that will be increasingly impossible as you age. In my 20s I could focus on things a couple of centimeters (~1") away with the naked eye, in my 50 it's about 15cm (5-6"). You can still perceive color, movement etc so a ring of LEDs would convey information well, tut tryi…

I think the idea is to project the screen into space at a distance.

The documentation shows something like this where the projection is off axis from the actual mirror doing the projection.

Re: Monocle: A pocket sized open-source AR device

#24

I would hope they include some basic apparel to wear the device. should one wear it as a pirate's eye patch?

Looks like it has a clip to attach to the front of a pair of glasses. Obviously suboptimal, really needs to be integrated into some old-timey welding goggles for the steampunk vibe. At $349 it’s almost in the range where I’d buy it to play around with but I suspect it’d end up in a drawer like a bunch of other things that looked cool but I never got around to hacking on. Once the technology gets good enough where the…

they are actually releasing a glasses version

Re: Monocle: A pocket sized open-source AR device

#26

Neat but (still) pricey. Not sold on the 640x480 display; it requires work to focus you eye to such a short distance and due to macular degeneration that will be increasingly impossible as you age. In my 20s I could focus on things a couple of centimeters (~1") away with the naked eye, in my 50 it's about 15cm (5-6"). You can still perceive color, movement etc so a ring of LEDs would convey information well, tut tryi…

The biggest issue is the lack of a camera facing backwards to track your eyes. Without it you can't overlay accurately onto real objects.

Re: Monocle: A pocket sized open-source AR device

#27

I would hope they include some basic apparel to wear the device. should one wear it as a pirate's eye patch?

Looks like it has a clip to attach to the front of a pair of glasses. Obviously suboptimal, really needs to be integrated into some old-timey welding goggles for the steampunk vibe. At $349 it’s almost in the range where I’d buy it to play around with but I suspect it’d end up in a drawer like a bunch of other things that looked cool but I never got around to hacking on. Once the technology gets good enough where the…

I suspect that fitting something like this into what looks like standard prescription glasses will require some advances in manufacturing optical materials. I think its already possible to make the appropriate lenses to sufficient precision, but the cost is a bit prohibitive.

The other issue is that the projection display is a bit low-res for what I'd really like to see, but 1 pixel works out to ~0.5mm at 1m, so it might be ok. That might be precise enough for (for instance) identifying particular through-hole connections on a circuit board at a rework station. It's certainly adequate for identifying components on an engine.

Post reply on HN