Live data from Hacker News

Interview with the founder of Teenage Engineering

scandinavianmind.com

171–180 of 207 posts

Re: Interview with the founder of Teenage Engineering

#171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Portable all in one groovebox with a keyboard. Even ignoring the keyboard, the creativity and fun of the OP-1s tape and synthesis modes, things like the gyro and FM radio, are fairly unique. There is a reason it is so successful.

You are of course free to have fun with the OP-1, but I found it to block my creativity when I constantly have to work around the omnipresent petty limitations like 4 tracks, 1 effect per voice, almost useless sequencers etc.

I agree and enjoyed the OP-Z more for that reason. They are supposed to be limited but that doesn't work for everyone.

Re: Interview with the founder of Teenage Engineering

#172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not $300, but the SP404 MK2 is sweet

Agreed, and the MPC One is an amazing value for all it can do.

I really want a Pioneer Toraiz SP-16 but can't justify it to myself because I really don't need it

Re: Interview with the founder of Teenage Engineering

#173
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There is a reason it is so successful. Yes, because it managed to capture a self-sustaining hype cycle powered by customers who for the most part don't really know what they're buying. It's more of a status item than an actually fun or useful musical instrument, IMO. This thread reminds me, I need to sell mine.

I was curious to hear about other products that are similar, but superior to OP-1, that previous reply alluded to.

I'm not an expert but I suspect an iPad with some interesting groovebox apps would provide just as much fun and be more powerful.

Re: Interview with the founder of Teenage Engineering

#174
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe they are referring to remote meetings where you can mute yourself.

Yea I mindlessly plunk around on it while muted.

why don't you just leave the meeting if you aren't paying attention anyway?

Re: Interview with the founder of Teenage Engineering

#175
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am also interested in the $300-500 all-in-one groovebox rivaling the OP-1 (without cow animation)

https://dirtywave.com/ Close enough.

But it is successful because it is totally not an OP-1.

Re: Interview with the founder of Teenage Engineering

#176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> i dont have the stomach to rip off customers as shamelessly as TE is Yet people buy their products in large quantities, for well over a decade... They are used by top tier artists and consumer alike, and are used on many hit songs. If you think they're so overpriced, there should be a massive opportunity to undercut them and sell such quality for less. But no one has... Again, for well over a decade... Maybe they u…

The candles that "smell like my vagina" for $75 by Goop company owned by Gwyneth Paltrow also sold out at launch, doesn't mean that that there's an opportunity to undercut them with better and cheaper crotch candles, not in the slightest; to put it succinctly there is a huge amount of people that make irrational purchases and there is no need to pretend otherwise.

Your definition of irrational is not everyone's. I suspect you buy things other people would consider irrational, yet you buy anyways. Does that make you irrational? Or do different people have different utility functions?

People buy what they want, not what you think they should.

Re: Interview with the founder of Teenage Engineering

#178
post #101

[flagged]

[flagged]

> and possibly reevaluate your participation in

Don't ever talk to me or anyone else on HN this way. We have enough backhanded civility here, and you're not improving discourse by commenting like this.

It's a parody comment of the "I'm Rich, You're Poor" segment.

https://www.google.com/search?q=on+today%27s+episode+of+i%27...

It's a joke. Take a joke.

Re: Interview with the founder of Teenage Engineering

#179
post #19

The photography of this is interesting. I'm not sure I'd know how to approach this assignment (I might start with rapport and portraiture in the space), but some things I noticed on different photos: * Warm vintage color cast on the '70s-looking gear wood panel. * On-camera-flash-like directional lighting, with harsh shadow (maybe to separate person from gear background, but both in focus?). * Contrast and saturation…

This style is ubiquitous—Terry Richardson, etc.

And has been for two decades now… remarkably long lived.

I think Richardson has a very similar technique, although he tends to shoot with white backgrounds. These specific pictures seem closer still to the photography in magazines like Apartamento, or in this case https://record-magazine.com/issues

I always wonder when this retro frontal flash approach will go out of style. It’s handy while it lasts, because it’s very easy to make interior shots this way. No need to bother with lighting setups, just a single big flash mounted with your camera. Quite the accessible style! Yet it does help to differentiate from phone cameras, which seems to be a driving force for photographic trends… Just like shallow depth of field has been fashionable for a while (and might go out of fashion now phones can fake it), big flashes are not typically found on phones.

The style also works, I think, because it channels event photography rather than art photography, which gives it its immediacy and nonchalance. It’s very similar to the look of photojournalism in the eighties when certain press photographers started working with colour films to document openings etc., they used the big Metz flashes on a bracket and the diffusers were less sophisticated so you get this very direct, often blown out light. And amateur photographs of parties at the time were much the same (albeit with smaller flashes).

So stylized (because retro) yet nonchalant. And it’s really easy to do, just have your flash fire a bit harder than it suggests on it own :)

Re: Interview with the founder of Teenage Engineering

#180
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was curious to hear about other products that are similar, but superior to OP-1, that previous reply alluded to.

If someone said "I have a $1400 (or $2000, now that they've raised the price) budget for a lightweight portable jambox/production setup, what would you recommend?" I would tell them to get an iPad Pro, an external audio interface, and a MIDI USB peripheral of their choice. GarageBand on iPad is perfectly fine for the type of screwing around you can do on an OP1, it's much more powerful overall, and it even supports s…

The OP1 has midi input over USB.
Post reply on HN