Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft Teams Premium: powered by OpenAI’s GPT-3.5

microsoft.com

81–90 of 169 posts

Re: Microsoft Teams Premium: powered by OpenAI’s GPT-3.5

#81
post #60
post #19

The real premium version of Microsoft Teams will be the one that doesn't crash my Google Chrome window every 30-45 minutes.

I don't use Teams as a daily driver, but I would be a candidate for a paid upgrade pack that made it have the polish one expects from an app built by a public company. In particular, the emoji are terrible.

At this point, I'm way past hoping to see any polish.

I'd be happy if they improved the responsiveness. Say to the level of MSN Messenger 20 years ago, even though I'm running 2022 hardware.

Re: Microsoft Teams Premium: powered by OpenAI’s GPT-3.5

#82

With more than 400 new features and improvements added to Microsoft Teams last year Unfortunately, the only things I've seen are trivial and IMHO entirely unnecessary changes like "change the icons" or "add more useless whitespace", or something that was already widespread and possible decades ago like "now we have multiple windows". If that's what they thought were "features and improvements", it explains why Teams…

400 "features and improvements" sounds like they just counted closed tickets. Ticket open -> couldn't reproduce -> ticket closed.

Re: Microsoft Teams Premium: powered by OpenAI’s GPT-3.5

#83
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You’re proposing that an imperfect AI flags (ok) or fires (wow) employees based on potentially bad input. Same thing on muting mic or doing any kind of auto moderation. That’s going very far on an imperfect technology. I’d sooner bet on autonomous driving than people using such a moderator.

No, it's not. We already employ profanity filters in multiplayer games. We also have rating systems in games that allow peers to flag toxic behavior after a game session for review. These have helped limiting the harm caused by toxic players. Those are simple low tech solutions that could be added to videoconferencing applications. Did someone act toxic during a meeting? Allow participants to report a toxic interacti…

I guess when we get to have AGI agents, they will start replacing HR, even though I doubt this will sit well with anyone. Again, it’s dystopian. Maybe in a Demolition Man world.

But today? Wew

Re: Microsoft Teams Premium: powered by OpenAI’s GPT-3.5

#84
post #19

The real premium version of Microsoft Teams will be the one that doesn't crash my Google Chrome window every 30-45 minutes.

That's why we're building FossTeams [1], an open source client for Microsoft Teams (:

The idea is to have a backend [2], powered by a library [3] that does the heavy lifting and a / multiple frontends to be used with that (e.g: CLI[4], Web frontend[5], Flutter app[6]).

We're looking for contributors! If you hate Teams and want to improve an Open Source version, PRs are welcome (:

[1]: https://github.com/fossteams

[2]: https://github.com/fossteams/fossteams-backend

[3]: https://github.com/fossteams/teams-api

[4]: https://github.com/fossteams/teams-cli

[5]: https://github.com/fossteams/fossteams-frontend

[6]: https://github.com/fossteams/fossteams_gui

Re: Microsoft Teams Premium: powered by OpenAI’s GPT-3.5

#85
I wish they would push the calling aspect of Microsoft Teams more. The technology is great:

1. Receive business calls from anywhere and any handset or computer. Seamlessly transfer and pick up the call on any device. Can be linked to inbound 1800, 1300 numbers, landline numbers, etc.

2. Can do call forwarding, ring-out forwarding, and voice messages

3. Voice messages are recorded, transcripted and the audio file and text transcript emailed to you. In many cases you don't even need to listen to the audio

4. Users can have their own inbound phone numbers (!) and outbound phone numbers (!) and i.e. push these automatically into email signatures, all centrally managed from Microsoft 365 Admin

5. Teams Desk phones require just an ethernet connection to work, don't require any SIP HW or configuration, and can be hotdesked in a few seconds

But the real issue is that the commercialization of it was poor. Microsoft outsourced the phone switchboard part to third party providers/resellers of the Teams calling packs, and these are usually small to medium SMB that operate like used car salesman and have stupid pricing models, i.e. minimum 10 phone numbers or users (in Australia, anyway) or sell you like four differently named confusing calling packs and addons that nobody can understand.

In the case of Telstra, they wanted $5000 (!!) for a consultant to setup a $10/user/mo Teams calling plan and wouldn't let us take out an account without going through a setup consultant. Similarly, another big telco we talked to required a minimum order of around $200/mo. For goodness sake, it's a SaaS, you should be able to just go online and order it without talking to anyone. A novel product and great idea, with truly poor commercialization and ZERO regulation of their partner network and their allowed pricing models.

Re: Microsoft Teams Premium: powered by OpenAI’s GPT-3.5

#86
The premium feature I would like is to automatically blur private chat messages and e-mails when sharing your screen. The number of times i have seen information leakage because someone is sharing their whole desktop grows every week. It needs a technological solution to it.

Re: Microsoft Teams Premium: powered by OpenAI’s GPT-3.5

#88
Have meeting transcripts been used to train LLMs? How long until AI Chatbots participate in meetings? Corporate, department, industry or employee-owned LLMs? https://twitter.com/migueldeicaza/status/1620915691133243394

> To impress your peers, and get a promotion, show that you care about the process, and sound smart, but without repeating what was said, you say:

Re: Microsoft Teams Premium: powered by OpenAI’s GPT-3.5

#90

Can they get gpt-3 to program a version of Teams that works?

Teams is one of those things that feels like we should have solved this like 10 years ago.

Same thing with online payment systems - how is it that we didn't have that stuff completely solved like 20 years ago?

I mean I know the answer deep down but seriously - Some folks did solve it, a lot did not or don't want to. Can't keep a job on a complete software package.

Post reply on HN