Live data from Hacker News

Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

flightradar24.com

291–300 of 421 posts

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#291

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You pay a 747 pilot way more than $50/hour. https://www.aviationinterviews.com/pilot/payrates/united-par...

Seems weird.. you get payed $39/hour in your first year.. then jump all the way up to $239/hour in your second year and never really get a raise beyond that?

I had assumed it was an error.

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#292

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agree. I've said for ~10 years now, that it seems the American Dream has transitioned from "Anything is possible as long as you work hard enough." to "Do as little as work possible to get the same paycheck." Something has definitely changed in the culture.

I think majority of jobs are low wage with no future prospects, and quite a lot of jobs have bosses or—worse—shareholders taking away the profits for their own private climate devastating opulence. Why would you work hard for these people? Why would you do anything more than the absolute minimum? I think this supposed American dream was only ever a ruse, a Hollywood propaganda. If it ever existed it only applied to a…

American Dream made sense when one person in the family worked for corporations. When everyone flooded the labor market, and automation made workers much more productive, wages got depressed. Now the American dream is propaganda for getting 30 year mortgages from banks and working to pay off the money you rented.

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#293

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's more that most people are basically trying their best and that includes managers and top brass. Sometimes we get a glimpse when that shines through from the whole group.

I find it highly unlikely that any manager would have anything to do with easter eggs.

You think a pilot took an unnecessarily longer route in a clients purchased plane without senior manager buy-in?

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#294
post #250

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I find it highly unlikely that any manager would have anything to do with easter eggs.

i highly doubt an IC could make something like this happen without approval from somebody. It would be a huge risk. Also relating to easter eggs, anecdotally I think there are far fewer of them in software these days for just that reason: when a developer puts in an easter egg, it's hard to prove categorically that its addition wouldn't have some unintended effect, and possibly very embarrassing to the company if a m…

https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/405783/why-does-man...

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#295

I find it just really endearing that at companies, regardless of how many other issues they have or the dysfunctions and bland corporate culture, there are people who keep the pride of purpose and "olden days / traditions" in their memory and do things like this. Or are able to call on institutional memory of something bygone, that reappears once in a while. (whether it's a big gesture like this or small cultural day…

As this involved an extra hour(?) of flight time, it cost thousands of dollars. It also required filing a particular flight plan, and probably coordination between Boeing and Atlas. So it seems safe to say that it required approval at a pretty high level. And given everything else that happened surrounding the delivery, that doesn't seem strange at all.

https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/n863gt/#2f0b1162

The drawing started at 16:50 UTC and ended at 19:30 UTC, so 2 hours and 40 minutes of the 6 hours and 20 minutes long flight.

In any case, this most likely required approval from the FAA, but the cost per se should be neglectable, considering that they have been produced since 1970s.

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#296

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t mean to be negative, but most people certainly don’t try their best. Many are only working for the paycheck and don’t attach their sense of success to their professional output.

I don't think "working for a paycheck" necessarily implies one is not trying his/her best. Also the sense of success may not even depend on "success at work". Being successful and trying their best is far more nuanced than usually made out to be.

This is one of the more excellent comments I’ve ever seen here. Thank you.

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#298
post #216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think majority of jobs are low wage with no future prospects, and quite a lot of jobs have bosses or—worse—shareholders taking away the profits for their own private climate devastating opulence. Why would you work hard for these people? Why would you do anything more than the absolute minimum? I think this supposed American dream was only ever a ruse, a Hollywood propaganda. If it ever existed it only applied to a…

> Why would you do anything more than the absolute minimum? For personal satisfaction? You are going to be there anyway, you might as well do a good job. I’m not saying to put in more hours than contracted, but those hours should be high quality (or as high as you can make them, under the circumstances).

I earn my paycheck and no more. When I work on my personal pet projects, that's where the passion and personal satisfaction is.

You want excellence? Treat me excellently and you'll get it.

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#299

I find it just really endearing that at companies, regardless of how many other issues they have or the dysfunctions and bland corporate culture, there are people who keep the pride of purpose and "olden days / traditions" in their memory and do things like this. Or are able to call on institutional memory of something bygone, that reappears once in a while. (whether it's a big gesture like this or small cultural day…

https://aviationsourcenews.com/breaking/atlas-air-to-fly-spe... The ceremony is prepared by CEO himself in this case.

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#300

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Drawing things in the sky seems to be a well established aviation tradition Not really... This level of high-precision and publicly-available flight tracking is pretty new.

This particular level and visibility of sky writing is new, but "drawing things in the sky" dates back to the 1920s or so. That sort of skywriting uses oil to cause the airplane to leave a trail of white smoke, visible against the blue background of the sky. The precision we see in this route is fairly new, but, especially on proving flights for new aircraft, which needed hours and hours of flight time and would take…

I'd say this is a very different type of drawing, because you only see it on a tracker. Someone watching in real live from the ground wouldn't see the pattern, because I don't think jet trails stay in the air for two hours.

This seems more like people using run/cycle trackers to make drawings on a map. (Strava Art)

Post reply on HN