Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

flightradar24.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

151–160 of 421 posts

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#151

Post by lxgr »

px43 wrote: post #114
blantonl wrote: post #89

This was almost certainly drawn out by hand, waypoints (lat/lon) and turns were plotted and then inputed into the flight management computer, and there is a good chance the plane just flew itself as told. Although given it was flown at such a lower altitude below 15k feed near Moses Lake (which is where Boeing does a ton of testing at that airport) it's possible the pilots hand flew this by following a pre-plotted ma…

They could also just spoof the ADS-B data right?

Given that the area is covered by radar (as well as MLAT SDR coverage), it would be tricky to pull off – and the FAA would probably not find it funny at all.

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#153

Post by lxgr »

ssgodderidge wrote: post #7

Any flight buffs know the estimated cost of doing something like that? I’m all for having fun, and I love that they spent the money to do it

Do it as part of a flight that needs to happen anyway (such as this one, which was a delivery)? Probably not much more than the fuel and overtime the pilots needed to fly a few extra turns.

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#154

Post by fragmede »

tobinfricke wrote: post #124
mulmen wrote: post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this tradition even new? Drawing things in the sky seems to be a well established aviation tradition.

> Drawing things in the sky seems to be a well established aviation tradition Not really... This level of high-precision and publicly-available flight tracking is pretty new.

This particular level and visibility of sky writing is new, but "drawing things in the sky" dates back to the 1920s or so. That sort of skywriting uses oil to cause the airplane to leave a trail of white smoke, visible against the blue background of the sky.

The precision we see in this route is fairly new, but, especially on proving flights for new aircraft, which needed hours and hours of flight time and would take off and land at the same airport, and even before the public could see it on a website, filing flight plans that contained (much cruder) drawings of "747" or otherwise certainly exist.

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#155

Post by anonymous_sorry »

tomcam wrote: post #120
anonymous_sorry wrote: post #116

I'm sure it's insignificant in the scheme of things, but I don't think it justifies the unnecessary carbon emissions

I am grateful I don’t live in the world you live in

But you do, I fear.

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#156

Post by mlindner »

londons_explore wrote: post #67
unglaublich wrote: post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then count the fame you get for it... and it actually _increases_ value!

[flagged]

Well polar bears are not affected first off, and secondly the amount of CO2 is basically nothing compared to even the daily world CO2 production.

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#157

Post by aeturnum »

fsckboy wrote: post #137
aeturnum wrote: post #16

Makes me think of the famous "707 Barrel Roll" story from its initial testing: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/60-years-ago-the-f... “You know that. Now we know that. But just don’t do it anymore.” Edit: forgot the barrel roll was on a 707 - not a 747

there's film of Tex Johnston's Dash-80 barrel roll https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaA7kPfC5Hk many years later, Boeing Chief Test Pilot John Cashman stated that just before he piloted the maiden flight of the Boeing 777 on Jun. 12, 1994, his last instructions from then Boeing President Phil Condit were “No rolls”. -- anecdote from https://theaviationgeekclub.com/that-time-tex-johnston-barre... I wonder why "the suit…

Thank you - I had never seen it. This is great.

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#158

Post by themadturk »

petilon wrote: post #136

The question in my mind is, what replaces the 747, and is it safe? Looks like 777X is going to replace 747. Does the 777X have the same design flaws as the 737 MAX, namely larger engine, positioned forward in way that destabilizes the airframe?

I can't answer your question directly, but the modern 737 is a 2010s aircraft forced into a 1965 design. Many, many problematic design decisions have been visited upon the low-rise airframe, and many critics of the plane think the 737s should have been retired long ago in favor of a new narrow-body aircraft. I don't think those kinds of design problems are present in the 777, which was a new design from the ground up.

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#159

Post by mlindner »

marginalia_nu wrote: post #146
samstave wrote: post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A single plane has less of an ability to " Destro The Environment " than a Single Politician.

While that's true that no individual action matters, it's also true that our individual actions taken as a whole has an impact on the world, and because of that, we must treat individual actions as though they had the impact of collective actions.

Collective individuals have simply no way of affecting the environment in any major way simply by collective behavior change. The only thing that will change things is positive policies that encourage good behavior through positive methods.

For example by making electric vehicles attractive Tesla did more for the environment than possibly any single company ever by causing the shift to EVs in the general populace’s psyche.

Alternatively by doing things like banning plastic straws you instead get malicious compliance and dislike for the policies. That will never change things in a positive direction in the long term.

Post reply on HN