Live data from Hacker News

Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

flightradar24.com

101–110 of 421 posts

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#101

Any flight buffs know the estimated cost of doing something like that? I’m all for having fun, and I love that they spent the money to do it

I'm guessing it is in the range of 50..60k. The sibling posts come up with lower values, including only fuel, ignoring the cost of the required regular (flight hours in this case) maintenance.

(ignore)

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#102

Any flight buffs know the estimated cost of doing something like that? I’m all for having fun, and I love that they spent the money to do it

Former pilot here: $3-4 million easy. FAA regulations alone require $500k per sky-number drawn by any aircraft [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MKOFTEN

I think the link you are looking for is https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/PEBCAK.

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#103
post #85
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Should note that's a 707 that Tex Johnston rolled, not a 747. I'm not aware of any barrel rolls performed in a 747.

It wasn't even a 707, it was a prototype model 367-80. There were some unusually significant structural differences between the prototype dash 80 and production 707's, for example: > The 132 in (3,400 mm) wide fuselage of the Dash 80 was large enough for four-abreast (two-plus-two) seating like the Stratocruiser. Answering customers' demands and under Douglas competition, Boeing soon realized this would not provide a…

Those two pages disagree. Your quote is from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_707, but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_367-80 has "The Dash 80 fuselage was wide enough at 132 inches (335 cm) for five-abreast seating; two on one side of the aisle and three on the other. The fuselage diameter for the production KC-135 was widened to 144 inches (366 cm) and Boeing originally hoped to build the 707 fuselage with that width. By the time the Boeing company committed to production, the decision had been made to design the production model 707 as a six-abreast design"

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#104
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interesting. I often feel safer in smaller (but not too small planes), where I don't see the wings visibly flapping. Something like a A320 or a 737. With 747s the wings flap up and down quite visibly in turbulence, and you can even see the fuselage twisting if the curtains aren't closed between the sections. There's also just the wall thickness to mass ratio. You ever notice that you can crash toy RC cars all you wan…

Maybe this video helps a bit to put all that twisting into perspective? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B74_w3Ar9nI

There's another one from way back where they bend a 747 wing until it breaks. Definitely puts into perspective how strong a wing is.

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#106

I find it just really endearing that at companies, regardless of how many other issues they have or the dysfunctions and bland corporate culture, there are people who keep the pride of purpose and "olden days / traditions" in their memory and do things like this. Or are able to call on institutional memory of something bygone, that reappears once in a while. (whether it's a big gesture like this or small cultural day…

Every complex project lives and dies by a relatively small group of true believers. From the outside, we don't know who they are, but sometimes we get a glimpse of their passion.

I think it's more that most people are basically trying their best and that includes managers and top brass. Sometimes we get a glimpse when that shines through from the whole group.

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#108

So, how does this work? Do you plot this via the Auto Pilot? Like, inserting a list of waypoints?

Given that they flew this below 15k feet, not requiring the full IFR flight plan which would be required above that altitude, I suspect they might have hand flown this out by Moses lake by following a magenta line on a map. They could have also just programmed the FMS with the waypoints and the plane flew itself.

Yeah even one step easier is following the flight director that tells you where to point the plane from a first person view.

Re: Easter egg in flight path of last 747 delivery flight

#110
post #101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm guessing it is in the range of 50..60k. The sibling posts come up with lower values, including only fuel, ignoring the cost of the required regular (flight hours in this case) maintenance.

(ignore)

Decommissioned? It's brand new.
Post reply on HN