Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Plus

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

241–250 of 1001 posts

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#241

Post by Kiro »

webstrand wrote: post #133
PedroBatista wrote: post #91

$20 seems reasonable. I wonder how are they going to deal with "unreasonable intensive usage" aka people/companies offering "AI" in their products when in reality they just act as a proxy between people paying them ( sometimes a lot of money ) and OpenAI.

$20 puts it way out of my price range. It's useful, but when I've been averaging around twenty queries a day and somewhat frequently get back hallucinated responses, it's not worth that price. I wish there was a pay-as-you-go or a lower tier offering.

I use it way less than that and think $20 is a steal. What software do you think is worth $20 a month?

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#242

Post by mmh0000 »

novaRom wrote: post #126
cloudking wrote: post #2

$20/month seems more reasonable than the rumored $42 (likely a Hitchhiker's Guide reference) If you are willing to pay for this service, why? What are your use cases?

For me, chatGPT is simply a good replacement for {stackexchange, reddit, wikipedia, github, google,bing, etc.}. All information is accessible in one place and it's easy to ask about anything and get a structured answer. My topics of interest are advanced math, philosophy of physics, and modern semiconductors technology.

GPT is amazing as a stackexchange, et. el. replacement. Just earlier today I used GPT to answer a really simple question which I Google failed to answer. I just wanted to programmatically change a setting in a Kubernetes deployment, but I really didn't want to take the time to figure out the insane JSON nesting.

This is so worth a subscription fee.

  Please write a kubectl command to correctly patch the imagePullPolicy to be equal to Always.

  kubectl patch deployment  --patch '{"spec":{"template":{"spec":{"containers":[{"name":"","imagePullPolicy":"Always"}]}}}}'

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#243

Post by ben_w »

deltree7 wrote: post #84
fragmede wrote: post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can just see the article now: OpenAI is run by a bunch of violent racist sexist rapists. Using the new "safe search off mode", we found out ChatGPT's underlying biases, and it turns out that it's horrible, the people that made it are horrible, and you're a horrible person for using their service. But really we're horrible for writing this article. OpenAI doesn't want that story to be written, but after Microsoft Ta…

Who cares about articles written by main stream media?

Almost by definition most of the population.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#244

Post by sterlind »

kerpotgh wrote: post #118
kensai wrote: post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So you want an oracle? Copyright as we know it might be in trouble in such a case. Litigations will go crazy.

It’s going to have to be a “labor of love”. Once the model is out there it will be shared and available, but this only works if there’s no company to litigate against and no chance of making money off the thing (other than possibly going the crypto route).

why can't crowdfunding work for this stuff? I'd gladly chip in like, $1K or something, to fund the training of a ChatGPT-like LLM, on the condition that it's publicly released with no fetters.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#247

Post by vood »

KaoruAoiShiho wrote: post #3

Is there never going to be a version with less restrictions and filters? That would really be worth paying for.

You can downvote me here for a promo, but by using gpt3 directly you can bypass all the restrictions. Thats one of the reasons we built writingmate.ai (often outages of GPT3 being the second reason)

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#248

Post by paweladamczuk »

Does anyone know about any privacy guarantees with the Plus tier?

I would use ChatGPT more in my day-to-day programming tasks but I don't really feel comfortable putting proprietary code into an OpenAI-owned service.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#249

Post by qup »

BeefySwain wrote: post #80
transitivebs wrote: post #47

Can't wait for the official API. In the meantime, we discovered a "stealth model" which is being used by some YC companies that ChatGPT uses under the hood. I just updated the chatgpt NPM package to use this stealth model w/ the official OpenAI completions API: https://github.com/transitive-bullshit/chatgpt-api

Can you explain what you mean by "stealth model"? What is it, who discovered it and how, etc?

https://github.com/waylaidwanderer/node-chatgpt-api

This repo talks about it.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#250

Post by [deleted] »

Kiro wrote: post #233
qorrect wrote: post #210

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm extremely worried. This tech is going to replace a lot of jobs in the next 10-20, including ours ( software ). And if not replace, it's going to cut the available positions drastically . We already have a great divide between those with money and those without and this is a nuclear bomb about to go off. Without any sort of UBI or social safety nets, this is going to be a true disaster.

That sounds awesome. I'm not worried things will sort itself out, just like happened with the industrial revolution. There will be some initial friction but in the long run it will be a massive net positive for humanity. Why should we waste manpower on something a machine can do?

[deleted]
Post reply on HN