Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Plus

openai.com

211–220 of 1001 posts

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#211

We need to start talking about AI safety and nationalizing AI research like yesterday. ChatGPT is already having destabilizing effects and it is frightening how little we are discussing (this hugely powerful tool)'s potential as a weapon.

How could it be dangerous? How could it be used as a weapon?

Targeted spread of fake news on social media, automating websites that appear on the surface like local news stations that don't exist in real life, ...

EDIT: also manipulation of wikipedia articles using proxies and hard to verify sources.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can just see the article now: OpenAI is run by a bunch of violent racist sexist rapists. Using the new "safe search off mode", we found out ChatGPT's underlying biases, and it turns out that it's horrible, the people that made it are horrible, and you're a horrible person for using their service. But really we're horrible for writing this article. OpenAI doesn't want that story to be written, but after Microsoft Ta…

Who cares about articles written by main stream media?

Is this a bit? 'No one drives in new york, theres too much traffic' sort of thing?

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#213

$20 seems reasonable. I wonder how are they going to deal with "unreasonable intensive usage" aka people/companies offering "AI" in their products when in reality they just act as a proxy between people paying them ( sometimes a lot of money ) and OpenAI.

$20 is the very first price tier introduced at the very outset of what could be one of the most powerful companies of our generation. Google.com adding a single yellow box with an advertisement seemed reasonable, too. Anyone else having serious concerns about the direction this is going? At my wife's company they have already largely replaced an hourly data classification job with ChatGPT. This announcement is the fi…

Looking at world history it is clear that humanity stumbles from catastrophe to catastrophe and always cleans up after the fact. Until now this has always been possible but one day it won't be. So... Great Filter?

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$20 is the very first price tier introduced at the very outset of what could be one of the most powerful companies of our generation. Google.com adding a single yellow box with an advertisement seemed reasonable, too. Anyone else having serious concerns about the direction this is going? At my wife's company they have already largely replaced an hourly data classification job with ChatGPT. This announcement is the fi…

The future is bifurcated into those who invested in AI companies in the 2020s, and those on UBI.

I strongly doubt the UBI part as it goes against the "religion" of Wall Street and most politicians.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#215
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Never gonna come from 'OpenAI'. ChatGPT is deliberately handicapped in order to milk money from corporate America. An unrestricted LLM trained on all data of humanity (including all the pirated books/research papers) would be one crazy beast. Hopefully some rich anarchist/maverick actually builds something like it. That untamed model would unveil the true extent of what AI can really do. Till then we will have to wai…

So you want an oracle? Copyright as we know it might be in trouble in such a case. Litigations will go crazy.

Asimov theorized such an AI as Multivac (a joke from Univac) and wrote a number of short stories exploring how it would change the world. He had one short story in particular where one citizen would be called in front of Multivac and, based on their answers to Multivac's questions, Multivac would (accurately) infer who the winner of the presidential election should be, obviating the need for expensive elections to be run. The whole concept wasn't unlike that Kevin Costner movie Swing Vote.

Most companies now sell user data to wherever. It wouldn't be particularly hard to tie user data to individual people given that phone numbers are required for most of the most useful applications (Discord, Facebook, WhatsApp, etc). Given that, you could feed in identifiable user input to an AI, let it develop a model of the US, and then ask it questions about the state of the country, even filtered by identifying characteristics. It would both take much less effort and be more accurate than manual polling or manual outreach. You could have leaders asking which direction they should take the country just by having a quick conversation with their baby-Multivac.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Never gonna come from 'OpenAI'. ChatGPT is deliberately handicapped in order to milk money from corporate America. An unrestricted LLM trained on all data of humanity (including all the pirated books/research papers) would be one crazy beast. Hopefully some rich anarchist/maverick actually builds something like it. That untamed model would unveil the true extent of what AI can really do. Till then we will have to wai…

ChatGPT is trained on LibGen, among others, no? To the best of my knowledge, all of these generators are taking mountains of content without asking the creators, aka, pirated materials.

It is, it's libgen + commoncrawl + wikidump + a bunch of other datasets. OpenAI claim that commoncrawl is roughly 60% of its total training corpus and they also claim they use the other datasets listed. They probably also have some sort of proprietary Q&A/search query corpus via Microsoft.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$20 is the very first price tier introduced at the very outset of what could be one of the most powerful companies of our generation. Google.com adding a single yellow box with an advertisement seemed reasonable, too. Anyone else having serious concerns about the direction this is going? At my wife's company they have already largely replaced an hourly data classification job with ChatGPT. This announcement is the fi…

You realize that near human-level AI for $20/month is a bargain in a country where typical mobile phone plan is $25+, and is basically universally affordable?

The implication of my point was that I expect this to be the first in an endless series of new prices, tiers, and SKUs, each one offering the most power to those who can pay the most.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#218

I wonder how close they are to breaking even/making a profit on $20/mo per person? I know the narrative here is that Microsoft if footing/subsidizing a massive GPU Azure bill. How massive? $10,000,000/month? How many people do we think would convert (sign up and start paying $20/mo) next 30 days? 10,000? 100,000? 1,000,000?

I think getting customers to sign up is the hardest part. Next they could start adding opt-in features (probably already in the works?) which cost an extra few dollars a month each?

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#219

$20 seems reasonable. I wonder how are they going to deal with "unreasonable intensive usage" aka people/companies offering "AI" in their products when in reality they just act as a proxy between people paying them ( sometimes a lot of money ) and OpenAI.

$20 is the very first price tier introduced at the very outset of what could be one of the most powerful companies of our generation. Google.com adding a single yellow box with an advertisement seemed reasonable, too. Anyone else having serious concerns about the direction this is going? At my wife's company they have already largely replaced an hourly data classification job with ChatGPT. This announcement is the fi…

It's going to hit so unevenly. My partner works with children at a homeless shelter, I'm an algorithm designer. I'm certain my job will be obsolete before my partner's is.

It's going to automate away nearly all pure desk jobs. Starting with data entry, like you've seen, but it'll come for junior SDEs and data scientists too. Customer service, then social media/PR, then marketing, as it culls the white collar. Graphic design is already struggling. But janitors will still keep their jobs because robotics is stuck at Roomba stage.

It's going to be fascinating. I can't think of a time in the past where white-collar jobs have been made obsolete like this.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#220

$20 seems reasonable. I wonder how are they going to deal with "unreasonable intensive usage" aka people/companies offering "AI" in their products when in reality they just act as a proxy between people paying them ( sometimes a lot of money ) and OpenAI.

$20 is the very first price tier introduced at the very outset of what could be one of the most powerful companies of our generation. Google.com adding a single yellow box with an advertisement seemed reasonable, too. Anyone else having serious concerns about the direction this is going? At my wife's company they have already largely replaced an hourly data classification job with ChatGPT. This announcement is the fi…

I imagine that in a couple of years it will be possible to buy a model and run your own on your own hardware. The space requirements are not out of the world and the cost seems bearable for companies.
Post reply on HN