Is there never going to be a version with less restrictions and filters? That would really be worth paying for.
ChatGPT Plus
61–70 of 1001 posts
Re: ChatGPT Plus
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes please. It really needs a “safe search off” mode. It can have a big disclaimer “if you ask for something offensive then you’ll get it”.
I can just see the article now: OpenAI is run by a bunch of violent racist sexist rapists. Using the new "safe search off mode", we found out ChatGPT's underlying biases, and it turns out that it's horrible, the people that made it are horrible, and you're a horrible person for using their service. But really we're horrible for writing this article. OpenAI doesn't want that story to be written, but after Microsoft Ta…
Re: ChatGPT Plus
#63$20/month seems more reasonable than the rumored $42 (likely a Hitchhiker's Guide reference) If you are willing to pay for this service, why? What are your use cases?
Re: ChatGPT Plus
#64Is there never going to be a version with less restrictions and filters? That would really be worth paying for.
Yes please. It really needs a “safe search off” mode. It can have a big disclaimer “if you ask for something offensive then you’ll get it”.
As usual, censorship and propaganda will arrive in a wrapper of "save the children"
Re: ChatGPT Plus
#65$20/month seems more reasonable than the rumored $42 (likely a Hitchhiker's Guide reference) If you are willing to pay for this service, why? What are your use cases?
Where are you seeing pricing information? $20/month still feels pretty steep for someone not using it constantly. I was really hoping they'd have a pay-per-query or something like it similar to DALL-E
I'm looking forward to LLMs you can host on your local machine.
Re: ChatGPT Plus
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm curious, what filters are you hitting that impede your effective use of ChatGPT? I've definitely seen some irritating outputs, e.g. progressive policy planks characterized as inherently good and correct positions, but only when I went looking for them. The guardrails haven't actually kept me from making use of it.
It's almost useless for writing fiction. The AI clearly has some idea of how, but any time anything even slightly less than perfectly-G-rated happens in the story, it hits the filters. Actually, it's even more restrictive than that implies. You can't so much as have two siblings quarrel without the AI insisting on turning it into a moral. Right then and there, immediately, never mind the concept of "Stories longer th…
Re: ChatGPT Plus
#67I'd love to understand how the "Plus" naming convention became so popular.
Re: ChatGPT Plus
#68Is there never going to be a version with less restrictions and filters? That would really be worth paying for.
Use their API. They have models in their API with similar capabilities and without guardrails.
They are actively monitoring the use of their APIs. On twitter there are people who claim they have been banned by OpenAI for generating racist texts with the raw API/playground.
Re: ChatGPT Plus
#69Re: ChatGPT Plus
#70I'll wait for it to hit 2$ (and hallucinate to a reasonable degree). No hurry. Or maybe it will be an office 365 feature in 2, 3 years? Meanwhile, the gpt api will do.