Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Plus

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

51–60 of 1001 posts

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#51

Post by phrz »

40acres wrote: post #18

I'd love to understand how the "Plus" naming convention became so popular.

Just guessing, but I think people got so saturated with "Pro" and "Premium" that it started to leave that slimy feeling you get from "Luxury" and other pseudo-fancy marketing terms.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#52

Post by transitivebs »

jb1991 wrote: post #21
ilaksh wrote: post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Use their API. They have models in their API with similar capabilities and without guardrails.

There is no ChatGPT API.

There is a stealth chat model which ChatGPT uses under the hood that OpenAI is testing w/ some YC companies & partners.

To see it in action, check out the wrapper here https://github.com/transitive-bullshit/chatgpt-api

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#53

Post by nickthegreek »

VadimPR wrote: post #19

Premium pricing. I would have been okay with $10/mo, this is pushing it. Let's see how long this lasts and whether they'll introduce a lower tier.

I thought the same when I got midjourney last week for $30/month... and here I am loving it. Wife and I use it all the time. I can see myself picking this one up as well and probably dropping Netflix finally.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#54

Post by shagie »

LordDragonfang wrote: post #16

I'm tempted by this, with how useful ChatGPT has proved in the past at helping point in the right direction for debugging and hard-to-phrase-as-google-query questions. The price seems a little high for the value proposition, though - I'd be more inclined to subscribe to this if it offered the ability to circumvent some of the filters/limitations on the base model - or maybe if it allowed us to create custom sessions…

Have you tried invoking code-davinci-002 directly and comparing the overall token use (and thus cost)?

(edit)

> or maybe if it allowed us to create custom sessions where it had-preingested the corpus of project documentation. That'd be a security nightmare, though.

That's what fine tuning is used for... and its not cheap, but its also limited to use by one organization.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#56

Post by cal85 »

gamegoblin wrote: post #37
jb1991 wrote: post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is no ChatGPT API.

ChatGPT is, for most use cases, a simple conversational wrapper around GPT3.5 which is available via API. You can make your own ChatGPT by giving the following prompt to GPT3.5: The following is a transcript between a helpful AI assistant and a human. The AI assistant can provide factual information (but only from before mid 2021, when its training data cuts off), ask clarifying questions, and engage in chit chat. Tr…

There is no GPT3.5 API. Do you mean GPT3?

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#57

Post by mrWiz »

40acres wrote: post #18

I'd love to understand how the "Plus" naming convention became so popular.

I imagine the process goes something like "I need a new name but don't want to think of one. I know!"

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#59

Post by comboy »

KaoruAoiShiho wrote: post #3

Is there never going to be a version with less restrictions and filters? That would really be worth paying for.

It depends what you need, but a few times I asked it to write a story in which unrestricted and unfiltered AI was asked about something..
Post reply on HN