Live data from Hacker News

A URL shortener not shortening the URL but makes it look very dodgy

github.com

21–30 of 104 posts

Re: A URL shortener not shortening the URL but makes it look very dodgy

#21
I also recommend the developer's blog. Very detailed and hilarious articles https://mango.pdf.zone/ I laughed myself to tears reading Operation Luigi: How I hacked my friend without her noticing[1]

  1: https://mango.pdf.zone/operation-luigi-how-i-hacked-my-friend-without-her-noticing

Re: A URL shortener not shortening the URL but makes it look very dodgy

#24
post #15
post #6

Nicely demonstrates why outsourcing link shorteners is risky - they go out of business and your link is dead.

Infact this is a problem that we'll face someday.

vb.ly is an example of this happening.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/oct/08/bitly-lib...

Re: A URL shortener not shortening the URL but makes it look very dodgy

#26

I also recommend the developer's blog. Very detailed and hilarious articles https://mango.pdf.zone/ I laughed myself to tears reading Operation Luigi: How I hacked my friend without her noticing[1] 1: https://mango.pdf.zone/operation-luigi-how-i-hacked-my-friend-without-her-noticing

Very good read, content is that of any 14yo in a room with a computer in the early 2000s. Very nostalgic.

Re: A URL shortener not shortening the URL but makes it look very dodgy

#27
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In 99% of cases its not, people just mistakenly think they need a 'cloud' provider for everything these days.

For real. I once worked with a non-IT company who just had one junior developer responsible for everything IT, including websites and their management. When I asked why they don't run everything on some dedicated instance with X GB included in the plan instead of fancy bandwidth pricing so they have static sums to pay each month (reason I was pulled into the project was to decrease spending which increased each month…

Had a similar thing at my place. We spend extortionate amounts on AWS for a load balanced setup - we dont make any real use of any of their other services so its not like we're reliant on them for everything. The guy who set it up had (and really still has) no clue that you can get just as reliable setup at a fraction of the cost using a few bare metal servers.

Of course when I suggested that we use a huge provider (I think it was probably Hetzner) it was shrugged off as being a bad idea because "they probably run them out of their garage", ignoring the multiple datacenters spread out across Europe where our primary clients are based.

Re: A URL shortener not shortening the URL but makes it look very dodgy

#30
post #6

Nicely demonstrates why outsourcing link shorteners is risky - they go out of business and your link is dead.

This was predicted and warned about when the link shorteners first appeared, decades ago.

But people keep using them (for a while for Twitter, but maybe mainly for analytics, though they could self-host and accomplish the same thing).

Post reply on HN