When bailed out banks paid bonuses it was understandably unpopular, but there was a certain logic that retaining talent optimized performance of the remaining bank, and therefore it was ultimately in the interest of taxpayers. It seems surprising that Intel either doesn't think that retaining top talent is in the interest of shareholders, or thinks that investors aren't able to understand the investment. I would assu…
Intel Cuts Employee Pay to Maintain Quarterly Dividend
11–20 of 293 posts
Re: Intel Cuts Employee Pay to Maintain Quarterly Dividend
#12Re: Intel Cuts Employee Pay to Maintain Quarterly Dividend
#13This is a good way to lose your best employees.
Re: Intel Cuts Employee Pay to Maintain Quarterly Dividend
#14I had to double check it wasn’t April 1st. This is a good way to lose your best employees.
Re: Intel Cuts Employee Pay to Maintain Quarterly Dividend
#15Re: Intel Cuts Employee Pay to Maintain Quarterly Dividend
#16I had to double check it wasn’t April 1st. This is a good way to lose your best employees.
If you're one of the best employees at Intel, who are you going to go work for? Choices are limited, and it's quite likely that those others are going to do roughly the same thing.
Also I think Meta and Amazon are getting in on the chips game?
Those are just the big players that I can think of too.
Re: Intel Cuts Employee Pay to Maintain Quarterly Dividend
#17Re: Intel Cuts Employee Pay to Maintain Quarterly Dividend
#18I had to double check it wasn’t April 1st. This is a good way to lose your best employees.
If you're one of the best employees at Intel, who are you going to go work for? Choices are limited, and it's quite likely that those others are going to do roughly the same thing.
Everyone is making custom CPUs or accelerators, or both nowadays. This isn't 2005.
Re: Intel Cuts Employee Pay to Maintain Quarterly Dividend
#19When bailed out banks paid bonuses it was understandably unpopular, but there was a certain logic that retaining talent optimized performance of the remaining bank, and therefore it was ultimately in the interest of taxpayers. It seems surprising that Intel either doesn't think that retaining top talent is in the interest of shareholders, or thinks that investors aren't able to understand the investment. I would assu…
I’m sure the key people won’t hurt as much, but hardware people are pretty screwed overall. Your mastery of some Intel process has not much value in the market.
I worked at a tenant in a well funded facility doing semiconductor manufacturing R&D and prototyping. The nicest cars on that lot belonged to the tradesmen running wire and pipe for the tools. A few execs drove fancy cars in their special lot.
Re: Intel Cuts Employee Pay to Maintain Quarterly Dividend
#20Pay cuts are better than layoffs. That said, investors need to take a paycut in dividends as well.