does this imply the lay-offs were a product of collusion at the executive level across the entire sector? If anyone could find evidence of that it would be extremely news-worthy. If I might adorn my hat of tin-foil for a second; at a big corp I used to work at, I heard execs predicting this outcome back in early 2022 in combination with being incredibly relaxed about the employment market being extremely hot at the t…
I mean, it's not the first time that SV execs have colluded. See also infamous Eric Schmidt / Steve Jobs non-poaching agreement that leaked. But I also don't think explicit collusion is actually necessary. Once one does it, the others can follow without fear of losing staff to the others. Meta and Twitter started the fire, the others can just toss in some logs. So it has the effective material results as if there was…
I agree but at the same time there was noise from the boardroom throughout the industry even BEFORE these layoffs at Meta, that this was coming.
I'm not convinced that Twitter is necessarily as relevant a data point given they were actually burning cash at the time and its understandable that a new (and possibly even reluctant) owner might want to rectify that.