Live data from Hacker News

Ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer (2022)

health.harvard.edu

141–150 of 305 posts

Re: Ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer (2022)

#141

Also seems possible that married men, who are at a lower risk for almost every negative health outcome there is, are also at a lower risk for prostate cancer due to what is outlined in the paper. Married men seem more likely to have frequent (ahem) both due to literally living with their partner, as well as having a lower likelihood of depression, higher testosterone (the higher test generally would lead to the marri…

In Spanish there's a saying that, translated, goes like: you f** less than a married man.

Re: Ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer (2022)

#142
post #89
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

I only ever heard cult used in the sense of an organised group that is lead to believe harmful and untrue things, but checking the dictionary, it can also just be "great devotion to [e.g., an] idea" (merriam webster) which could be said of nearly any subreddit. In what way do you mean it? Besides the correlation in this study, is there anything particularly harmful in the same way that a more stereotypical cult (KKK…

People in the nofap community claim that abstaining from masturbation gives them "super powers".

From Google, a cult is "a system of religious veneration and devotion directed toward a particular figure or object."

They venerate non-masturbation as if it were a deity able to grant them divine powers if they worship it enough. Or at least that's how it sounds like when you hear them talk about it.

Re: Ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer (2022)

#143
post #49

Dont show this to the nofap community

When I'm in the mood of reading a bunch of smug nerds pontificating and preaching, I click on any popsci or diet-related article on HN. Never fails to entertain. Nofap like many things has been turned into a brand, and even politicised to the point some idiots attack it saying it's far right ideology. On the other hand there are teenagers with serious porn-related issues that think nofap will turn them into superhuma…

Yeah I agree, the frustration is real. You can't really joke about "serious" addictions like heroin or binge eating like you can with porn, and it results in your concerns being taken less seriously. Sexual humor is validated everywhere and it entraps those with less self control

And one thing I haven't seen mentioned a whole lot, the release of Stable Diffusion has made my problem way, way worse. I've been magnetized to the screen for weeks on end reading up on machine learning concepts and training on dozens of datasets, just to fuel my addiction and the inner weaknesses that prop it up

I sometimes wonder if this is the future, if this kind of irresistible, infinite ultra-personalization is here to stay, and the paper writers will continue to keep their "Ethics" sections to a maximum of five sentences each buried in the back

Re: Ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer (2022)

#144
post #129
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wouldn’t be the first time a self-pleasuring tool was widely regarded as a wondrous medical device … there was one that treated a catch—all disease called “hysteria” in the other half of the human population: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-vibrator/ Let’s not forget the kids before puberty. Today’s “hysteria” is alive and well — it’s called ADHD and it involves overdiagnosing rambunctiousness and pres…

[flagged]

I do educate myself. I read many different viewpoints, including for example parents whose own kids were diagnosed with ADHD and did more research. As one example: https://www.amazon.com/ADHD-Hunter-Farmers-Thom-Hartmann/dp/...

First of all, I appreciate your sharing of personal anecdotal experience (I mean that sincerely), and I am open to more infomation. But you should be also willing to educate yourself on what your country and system are doing. What I am about to share with you below — if you click the links, will probably shock you and make you question whether the issue is really your personal medical issue. At the very least, you have probably never seen it before.

First of all, no one is saying that it’s “all in your head” or you can snap yourself out of it. Any more than diabetes is in people’s heads. What I’ve been saying is that you are downstream of a fixable problem, that most of society doesn’t realize — or even have the desire to fix - with its current priorities.

I certainly understand how you feel you have a genetic disorder or clinical disease that can only be “managed” by medical intervention.

It’s not your fault. You are an individual who has been told by your country’s system that things are the way they are, because it is always easier to externalize the cost to the individual and make them believe a story than to fix the problems of industry. Here is just a sample list that goes well beyond ADHD or obesity, and into factory farms, plastic pollution, and more… it is always the same pattern:

https://magarshak.com/blog/?p=362

When there is a huge disparity between the USA and other countries (eg on prevalencd ADHD, or on obesity and diabetes) or USA now and before, it is a sign that the problem is upstream — often having to do with corporations, diet, and societal changes.

But I will go even further. Even effective cures to major diseases that are not approved by the bureaucracy, are shut down by the USA. All the way up to and including cures for diseases that you would think you’d know about. You as an individual probably NEVER heard of this:

https://youtu.be/rmxUsAI29fw

This is a video showing actual footage from all the congressional hearings, the actual results of multiple scientific inquiries at the highest level — the text of the actual letters from the CDC, and actual medical journal reportings that you have never heard about.

It is like “progress and poverty” by Henri George, a bestselling economic book totally forgotten today… similarly this kind of stuff has been systematically buried by your government.

I know I got really deep with this comment but who on HN has seen for example the video I linked to above, and how deep the rabbithole goes?

Re: Ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer (2022)

#145
post #58
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I'm in the mood of reading a bunch of smug nerds pontificating and preaching, I click on any popsci or diet-related article on HN. Never fails to entertain. Nofap like many things has been turned into a brand, and even politicised to the point some idiots attack it saying it's far right ideology. On the other hand there are teenagers with serious porn-related issues that think nofap will turn them into superhuma…

“Sorry, I’m in a cranky mood” Made me look up the word cranky and found “crankshaft” - a shaft driven by a crank that turns reciprocating motion into rotating motion. Legit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciprocating_motion

Please save comments like this for Reddit. Seriously, someone is discussing struggles with an addiction and you’re making jokes. Not legit at all.

Re: Ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer (2022)

#146
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nofap is just secular Puritanism with its canon replaced with biotruths, poor interpretations of evolutionary biology and the ramblings of people driven insane by celibacy.

I haven't been there in a while so unless something recently changed, I don't know where you're getting this from. Care to link any such material being posted and supported by others in the community?

I don't have a desire to go through that community again. I'm basing this off of what I saw ~5 years ago and on the people in my life who were part of that community. Your experience could be different.

Re: Ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer (2022)

#147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

24, recently single.

I'm more surprised that the "Gigachad" username was still available on HN until 2021.

Even in 2023, "HangingChad" probably dominates the discourse ...

Re: Ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer (2022)

#148
post #107

Also seems possible that married men, who are at a lower risk for almost every negative health outcome there is, are also at a lower risk for prostate cancer due to what is outlined in the paper. Married men seem more likely to have frequent (ahem) both due to literally living with their partner, as well as having a lower likelihood of depression, higher testosterone (the higher test generally would lead to the marri…

I would actually expect most married men to have less frequent ejaculations. I'm not married myself, but my impression is that most couples don't keep up a daily sexual routine for several decades, and finding time and space to self-stimulate is awkward if your live-in partner is not in the mood. One thing I actually prefer (ironically) about the single life is that the schedule of your sexual release, which has a bi…

Your expectations are wrong. All data support married couples having the most satisfying sexual relationships.

Re: Ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer (2022)

#149
post #13

So YouPorn is a medical device now. Seriously: those are not the sole studies showing those evidences. There are older with the same results. Religion and movements that prevent masturbation are disturbing from the point of view of the sexual development of teenagers.

Someone recently asked me what my views were on pr0n and I said I dunno, like a couple of million? (c) TWTR

Re: Ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer (2022)

#150
post #116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> wrongly assume sexual activity prevents cancer What is the potential danger here? I’m not aware of any links to adverse heath for men ejaculate 21 times or more a month. Are you? Seems low risk for something that will potentially give you a 31% decreased chance to get prostate cancer. >Lifetime of avoiding fat… That’s too bad. Low fat diets have been debunked for at least 20 years. They were pushed by companies tha…

> What is the potential danger here? People wasting other peoples time by giving advice that does nothing. Averting focus from things that are productive. Drowning useful information in information that may not necessarily be bad for you but isn't beneficial either.

> Averting focus from things that are productive.

Technically speaking, sex is productive.

Post reply on HN