21–30 of 109 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Disagree, this is very much needed. The problem with AI-generated content is that it looks superficially worthwhile and plausible, but in fact it often says things that are not correct.
> The problem with AI-generated content is that it looks superficially worthwhile and plausible, but in fact it often says things that are not correct. This is also a problem with human-generated content.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Disagree, this is very much needed. The problem with AI-generated content is that it looks superficially worthwhile and plausible, but in fact it often says things that are not correct.
Which is true for most human-generated content, too.
If you dig well, there are people who do really good content out there
Sorry.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Disagree, this is very much needed. The problem with AI-generated content is that it looks superficially worthwhile and plausible, but in fact it often says things that are not correct.
> The problem with AI-generated content is that it looks superficially worthwhile and plausible, but in fact it often says things that are not correct. This is also a problem with human-generated content.
ChatGPT's response: https://imgur.com/a/u7iBBaX
GPTZero's response: https://imgur.com/a/89icz2X
To be clear, my story was ChatGPT-assisted. But I wonder why ChatGPT couldn't detect it correctly like GPTZero?
I can tell you that detecting AI plagiarism can be a challenging task, as AI models like ChatGPT are able to generate text that is similar to existing text. It is important to note that not all text generated by AI models is considered plagiarism, as it may be used in a legal, educational or research context. The best way to evaluate the accuracy of a plagiarism detection website would be to test it using a variety o…
Can an algorithm write an article about the 2008 financial crisis? Of course! it has read God knows how many Wikipedia articles, books and online discussions about it. But everything the AI knows is because some humans put in the work and documented everything.
If we don't know something, be it a historical fact or a scientific model, we have the ability to go out in the real world and record the data. Can ChatGPT fly to Yemen and interview refugees? Can ChatGPT tear apart the circuitry of a home appliance, reverse engineer it and write a blog post about it? Can ChatGPT go to a lab and make chemical experiments to create new compounds?
No, it can only regurgitate what it knows and even what it doesn't know.
ChatGPT will absolutely steal the job of all the "journalists" that just regurgitate what others have already written. Original research and field reporting will be left to the real journalists for God knows how many decades. If your job consists of actually making new things or collecting real-world data then I think it will be safe for the decades to come.