Live data from Hacker News

Apple: The only big tech giant going against the job cuts tide

blog.pragmaticengineer.com

51–60 of 405 posts

Re: Apple: The only big tech giant going against the job cuts tide

#52

https://techpp.com/2023/01/25/tech-layoffs-apple-2023/ > Amazon, for instance, hired about 780,000 people during the pandemic. Meta, too, had more than doubled its staff in this period, going from about 40,000 to 87,000. Even Microsoft had hired about 77,000 people just before the pandemic. > Apple, in comparison, is believed to have hired under 20,000 people during the period of the pandemic. Can't layoff people you…

The Microsoft numbers do not seem right. This must include all the hires for attrition / backfills.

Re: Apple: The only big tech giant going against the job cuts tide

#53

Apple is a generally more well run, mature, patient, and scrupulous company than most others.

You make them sound like saints. They are not, and they have a history of being less scrupulous than some of these other companies. Here's just a small example of what they're capable of when their obsession for secrecy and control makes them flex their corporate muscle: http://www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/mobile/09/07/iphone.5.probe/ind... And we didn't even talk about their sweatshops in China which has always had persist…

Curious about where you source any Fair Trade silicon you might be using?

Re: Apple: The only big tech giant going against the job cuts tide

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Google has the focus of a crack addled flea and has products that aren’t profitable and people working on them - including probably 4 new messaging apps simultaneously. Facebook predicted that it would lose billions in potential revenue because of Apple making tracking optional. Microsoft is basically just cutting employees that are on products that it doesn’t care about anymore. You can say what you will about Apple…

Google was doing Fuchsia. SUPER cool... but what is the business case there? They are also ham strung by just not listening to customers it feels like - so I think that impacts traction. You get an 80% solution with simple glaring edges. Thousands ask - please fix this edge, but whoever is driving the product is onto something else it feels like sometime. Apple's main product lines all seem to make money, have positi…

I would just love to be able to run my own OS on the car.. I'd write the shit out of a better interface.

Re: Apple: The only big tech giant going against the job cuts tide

#55
post #37

https://techpp.com/2023/01/25/tech-layoffs-apple-2023/ > Amazon, for instance, hired about 780,000 people during the pandemic. Meta, too, had more than doubled its staff in this period, going from about 40,000 to 87,000. Even Microsoft had hired about 77,000 people just before the pandemic. > Apple, in comparison, is believed to have hired under 20,000 people during the period of the pandemic. Can't layoff people you…

The Amazon new hire numbers represent all workers (and almost entirely - warehouse/logistics). The Amazon layoffs numbers represent corporate roles. Someone is comparing Apples and Oranges

I see what you did there

Re: Apple: The only big tech giant going against the job cuts tide

#56

Apple is a generally more well run, mature, patient, and scrupulous company than most others.

You make them sound like saints. They are not, and they have a history of being less scrupulous than some of these other companies. Here's just a small example of what they're capable of when their obsession for secrecy and control makes them flex their corporate muscle: http://www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/mobile/09/07/iphone.5.probe/ind... And we didn't even talk about their sweatshops in China which has always had persist…

> And we didn't even talk about their sweatshops in China where employees kill themselves an awful lot, the Chinese government boosting iPhone production with child slave labor, and all the many other scandals they've been involved with.

This tired argument again.

Apple has always led the industry in their auditing of their supply chain and taking proactive steps to address illegal and unethical behaviour. There will always be mistakes but it's how you deal with them that counts.

If you're going to call Foxconn a sweatshop then arguably Amazon, Tesla etc should be called them as well.

Re: Apple: The only big tech giant going against the job cuts tide

#57

https://techpp.com/2023/01/25/tech-layoffs-apple-2023/ > Amazon, for instance, hired about 780,000 people during the pandemic. Meta, too, had more than doubled its staff in this period, going from about 40,000 to 87,000. Even Microsoft had hired about 77,000 people just before the pandemic. > Apple, in comparison, is believed to have hired under 20,000 people during the period of the pandemic. Can't layoff people you…

Where did all these people come from?

Oh you know, just around

Re: Apple: The only big tech giant going against the job cuts tide

#58
I don't recall whether this was ever stated explicitly, but I always had the impression that this is one of the elements of Apple's strategy that is still driven by the tribal memory of the late 1990s turmoil. Both Steve Jobs and Tim Cook were there at the time, and especially the former (who also had witnessed a 1980s bust) was determined to never be in this position again.

So as a consequence:

* Apple is hoarding cash to an extent that business analysts dislike (although Tim has reduced this to some extent)

* Teams are being run leaner than they'd like to be (not nearly as much so as in the pre-iOS times, admittedly)

* Conversely, since the company builds good reserves and not too much bloat in good times, it can and will avoid overreacting to bad times.

Re: Apple: The only big tech giant going against the job cuts tide

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, Tim Cook started by halving his compensation. I didn't hear anything like that from his fellow CEOs who all "took full responsibility" for the choice of going for mass firing instead.

It's not like him halving his compensation makes any material difference in the ability of the company to avoid layoffs.

It's a PR stunt. Get shareholders and the public talking about 'oh poor CEO he lost a few of the many many millions he earns a year'
Post reply on HN