SQLAlchemy's lightweight SQL wrapping was a revelation when I came across it, but I've come to rely a lot on Django's migration tooling, enough so to choose Django for projects. What do people using SQLAlchemy use for migrations?
SQLAlchemy 2.0 Released
31–40 of 84 posts
Re: SQLAlchemy 2.0 Released
#32I learned the hard way that I need to always use SQLAlchemy. I used other Python ORMs before and has been bitten hard with random bugs.
Re: SQLAlchemy 2.0 Released
#33SQLAlchemy's lightweight SQL wrapping was a revelation when I came across it, but I've come to rely a lot on Django's migration tooling, enough so to choose Django for projects. What do people using SQLAlchemy use for migrations?
Re: SQLAlchemy 2.0 Released
#34I checked unified doc and it had improved but , still wall of texts.. quite hard to read. Readability count's.
Re: SQLAlchemy 2.0 Released
#35Re: SQLAlchemy 2.0 Released
#36For a decade I avoided sqlalchemy, we finally got to use it last year and found it quite overwhelmingly complex and 1.4 documentation is messy. We had to use mixed styles. I checked unified doc and it had improved but , still wall of texts.. quite hard to read. Readability count's.
Re: SQLAlchemy 2.0 Released
#37I would urge people who have had issues with the documentation to give the 2.0 documentation a try. Many aspects of it have been completely rewritten, both to correctly describe things in terms of the new APIs as well as to modernize a lot of old documentation that was written many years ago. First off, SQLAlchemy's docs are pretty easy to get to, for a direct link just go to: https://docs.sqlalchemy.org/ It's an eso…
Re: SQLAlchemy 2.0 Released
#38I would urge people who have had issues with the documentation to give the 2.0 documentation a try. Many aspects of it have been completely rewritten, both to correctly describe things in terms of the new APIs as well as to modernize a lot of old documentation that was written many years ago. First off, SQLAlchemy's docs are pretty easy to get to, for a direct link just go to: https://docs.sqlalchemy.org/ It's an eso…
Re: SQLAlchemy 2.0 Released
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Check out pugsql, we switched from SQLAlchemy to that because the former was overkill, and way too complex.
I find ORM models useful for type checking and migrations, what is your experience for this with pugsql?
Re: SQLAlchemy 2.0 Released
#40Some github issues:
https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/40686
https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/40460
I'm not actively following how compatible pandas has become, but you should absolutely test your code if you want to upgrade to 2.0.