Ask HN: Is there such thing as “too many layers of error correction codes”?
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Ask HN: Is there such thing as “too many layers of error correction codes”?
#2Re: Ask HN: Is there such thing as “too many layers of error correction codes”?
#3No. Error correction does add some cost, but never makes errors worse.
However, in practice I think that you are right.
Re: Ask HN: Is there such thing as “too many layers of error correction codes”?
#4I've also seen people nerd sniping themselves on erasure coding while neglecting basic features.
Re: Ask HN: Is there such thing as “too many layers of error correction codes”?
#5The end result will always be more robust to errors than it would be otherwise, but the code rate will be smaller (i.e., the same data takes a constant multiple more space to store.)
Re: Ask HN: Is there such thing as “too many layers of error correction codes”?
#6It's fairly easy to analyze the effect of layering ECCs mathematically. The end result will always be more robust to errors than it would be otherwise, but the code rate will be smaller (i.e., the same data takes a constant multiple more space to store.)
Re: Ask HN: Is there such thing as “too many layers of error correction codes”?
#7It's fairly easy to analyze the effect of layering ECCs mathematically. The end result will always be more robust to errors than it would be otherwise, but the code rate will be smaller (i.e., the same data takes a constant multiple more space to store.)