Earlier quoted context omitted.
Normally I'd like to try to understand what you have against AGPL (Opa is dual licence btw.) but given that half of your wording is around words like "retarded" and "stupid", I'm not sure whether you're really interested in real discussion?
From previous experience with AGPL licensed libraries and tools, I decided that it's best to avoid them without exception. Basically, GPL and LGPL are the only acceptable licenses from the *GPL family of licenses when building websites. (GPL/LGPL/MIT/BSD for the server side software, LGPL/MIT/BSD for the JS libraries reaching the browsers) I don't like the idea of being forced to license the app under the same licens…
Re: Opa (the programming language) Enters 2012 With Strong Customer Adoption
#11[deleted]