I'm trying to understand how big of a deal ChatGPT and the like is or isn't. Even people in AI don't seem to agree on whether it's going to change everything or it's overhyped and not a major advancement. Which is it? Or somewhere in the middle? "if you think AI chatter has reached an annoying level right now you're in for something else. it's going to be the only thing on anybody's mind starting shortly... i'm findi…
ChatGPT Cheat Sheet
41–50 of 145 posts
Re: ChatGPT Cheat Sheet
#42I'm trying to understand how big of a deal ChatGPT and the like is or isn't. Even people in AI don't seem to agree on whether it's going to change everything or it's overhyped and not a major advancement. Which is it? Or somewhere in the middle? "if you think AI chatter has reached an annoying level right now you're in for something else. it's going to be the only thing on anybody's mind starting shortly... i'm findi…
So, if you are using it as a “personal assistant” and “supervise it” is a big (very big) deal since it's going to save a lot of time.
There are also some unknowns related to the cost/time needed to train and run the infrastructure behind it that could change a lot of things.
Re: ChatGPT Cheat Sheet
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
I already fear my productivity drop when OpenAI finally takes ChatGPT offline.
What sorts of things are you using it (successfully) for? I've gotten it to write a script or two for me, but it feels like usually I have to type out so much context (or domain/business knowledge) that it doesn't end up saving much effort.
Re: ChatGPT Cheat Sheet
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Crypto looked useful as long as the price kept going up. Everyone likes free money.
That was the crass money-making part of it, but a lot of nerds earnestly believe(d) that cryptocurrencies would have massive world-changing consequences. I think it's increasingly obvious that there's little rational or empirical basis for such belief. With AI, the biggest claims I see are overwhelmingly from people who are not doing cutting-edge work in the field, who have no real foundation for a belief that these…
I'm a big believer in the "capability overhang" idea, which is that the existing language models still have a huge array of capabilities that we haven't discovered yet.
That theory seems to be proved correct on a constant basis. Even the classic "let's think about this step by step" paper came out less than a year ago: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.11916 - May 2022.
Re: ChatGPT Cheat Sheet
#45One day this will be as obvious as a "how to google" guide
A lot of people are really bad at using search engines.
Re: ChatGPT Cheat Sheet
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't understand these comparisons between crypto and generative AI models. The AI models just seem so clearly and instantly more useful to me.
> useful to me. To you yes. Now go out in the real world in which most people don't work in an office and mostly use internet for entertainment Crypto seemed very useful to many people, and they still do, you'll find thousand upon thousands of comments and this very website preaching cryptos as the next game changer
But honestly you sound just like someone in 1996 going "Oh the internet isn't going to change anything and is just a fad", and here we are decades later and the internet has changed almost everything in our lives. Every person you know uses the internet every day on their cellphones in one way or another.
Re: ChatGPT Cheat Sheet
#47If you're not a fan of Google drive: https://github.com/kristopher-wayton/chat-gpt-cheatsheet-nue...
Re: ChatGPT Cheat Sheet
#48I'm trying to understand how big of a deal ChatGPT and the like is or isn't. Even people in AI don't seem to agree on whether it's going to change everything or it's overhyped and not a major advancement. Which is it? Or somewhere in the middle? "if you think AI chatter has reached an annoying level right now you're in for something else. it's going to be the only thing on anybody's mind starting shortly... i'm findi…
I know people that use it to write slide deck copy, which I think is nice because no one really cares about that and it saves some time. I do think it's a nice tool to get a general idea of something or even can be used as a writing prompt.
For some coding answers as of now, it's actually just easier and faster to use Google/Bing and find an answer on StackOverflow.
Re: ChatGPT Cheat Sheet
#49Chatgpt certainly spits out answers and is often right or reasonably close to right. But it cant be trusted on complex tasks and I do not think it is a good AI, I have to repeat, this thing is supposed to be an AI,but it does the AI part very poorly. We all know it will trip over questions like what is the record for crossing the atlantic by car/foot and such. But I have realized there is no feedback loop, or a wrong…
I agree, it's far from perfect, but as a tool it's certainly usable and useful, with quite fascinating emergent behaviour.
Re: ChatGPT Cheat Sheet
#50I'm trying to understand how big of a deal ChatGPT and the like is or isn't. Even people in AI don't seem to agree on whether it's going to change everything or it's overhyped and not a major advancement. Which is it? Or somewhere in the middle? "if you think AI chatter has reached an annoying level right now you're in for something else. it's going to be the only thing on anybody's mind starting shortly... i'm findi…
"Personally I can give you a formal definition of intelligence and even a number of speculative sketches of how I think it could be implemented, but I will also tell you that strong AI is not within sight and that recent advances are not moving us in the direction of strong AI"
Tools that assist in knowledge work can be very useful and very impactful on the knowledge industries without needing to even define "strong AI", let alone "being smart", "knowing ideas", et al.
What's important is not what we call these things or how we talk about what they do in an abstract manner rather if these tools are useful.
There's a general lesson here: Don't waste your time talking yourself in philosophical circles about what "AI" means, or what "knowing" means, or what "ideas" mean. If you'd like further convincing please see Philosophical Investigations by Wittgenstein. If pressed I'm just going to do a cheap imitation so you might as well get it from the source.
Personally, I have found ChatGPT, Stable Diffusion, Copilot, and a number of other large language models and tools built on large language models to be very useful.
I fed a folk song I was working on into ChatGPT and asked it to conjure up some similar evocative scenery... I then generated animations with Stable Diffusion based on a linear interpolation between those descriptions of that evocative scenery in the latent space... Then I wrote wrote some more lyrics about the weird stuff Stable Diffusion was hallucinating... and in the end I had a bunch of visual images, a song, and some animations, all that seem worthy of publishing. The visual components would otherwise never have been made as I don't have the time or money to do much more than sit around with my acoustic guitar and write songs.