Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: New AI edits images based on text instructions

github.com

101–110 of 241 posts

Re: Show HN: New AI edits images based on text instructions

#101
post #49

>11GB VRAM Aaarrrgghh let me know when it's down to 4GB like Stable Diffusion The prompt-based masking sounds incredible, with either pixel +/- or Prompt Relevance +/- VERY impressive img2img capabilities!

You can get a used 2080Ti for under $300 on eBay

That's a lot of money for most people. It also means they have to have a PC to put it in.

Re: Show HN: New AI edits images based on text instructions

#103
post #84

Here is a colab you can try it in. It crashed for me the first time but worked the second time. https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1rOvQNs0Cmn_yU1bKWjC...

Huh, I'm trying it now and the results seem so weak compared to any other model I've seen since dall-e.

Re: Show HN: New AI edits images based on text instructions

#108
Wow, it's really impressive to see how advanced AI image generators have become! The ability to create stable diffusion images with a "just works" approach on multiple operating systems is a huge step forward in this technology. We've deployed similar tech and APIs for our customers and are contemplating using this library as part of our pipeline for https://88stacks.com

Re: Show HN: New AI edits images based on text instructions

#109

Wow, it's really impressive to see how advanced AI image generators have become! The ability to create stable diffusion images with a "just works" approach on multiple operating systems is a huge step forward in this technology. We've deployed similar tech and APIs for our customers and are contemplating using this library as part of our pipeline for https://88stacks.com

Dark patterns are frowned upon here on HN.

Letting the user upload dozens of images and only after that telling them they need an account. Not good.

Re: Show HN: New AI edits images based on text instructions

#110
I am not a fan of software such as this putting in an arbitrarily "safety" feature which can only be disabled via undocumented environment variable. At least make it a flag documented for people who don't have an issue with nudity. There isn't even an indication that there is a "safety" issue, you just get a blank image and are wondering if your GPU/model or install is corrupted.

This isn't running on a website that is open to everyone or can be easily run by a novice.

Anyone capable of installing and running this is also able to read code and remove such a feature. There is no reason to hide this nor to not document it.

Also the amount of nudity you get is also highly dependent on which model you use.

Post reply on HN