Live data from Hacker News

Tweetbot. April 2011 – January 2023

tapbots.com

61–70 of 427 posts

Re: Tweetbot. April 2011 – January 2023

#61
post #21

Won't this hurt Elon in the long run? I was never able to stand the official Twitter app it's filled with ads and irrelevant clutter. I think since moving to Android Tweetbot is one of the few apps I miss from having on my phone. I was still enjoying the Mac version. I guess I will stick to Nitter [0] from now on. [0] - https://nitter.net/

Most people don't use third party clients, so no it won't.

Re: Tweetbot. April 2011 – January 2023

#62

I don't think they realise the damage this change has done. I have been on board with or ambivalent about most of the changes. I don't care if there's less moderation, I think Twitter probably did have too many employees, and I like the idea of a paid account with fewer (preferably no) ads. I'd even have happily paid Twitter to continue using Tweetbot. But this has destroyed the trust and the user experience of many…

I also do not think Musk understands just who the primary userbase on many of these 3rd party apps were -- many of those pesky advertisers/brands that he seems to be both courting and at war with exclusively use api apps for tracking posting/responding and integrations.

Those aren't the same APIs that were turned off for third party clients though, correct?

Re: Tweetbot. April 2011 – January 2023

#63
post #6

The question I have with this move is why didn't Twitter just force advertising as part of their API for third party clients? Just change the TOS for using the API so if they didn't show advertising they would be cut off. What am I missing?

The absence of ad-tweets inserted into the API feed with an API term of "you must display these or we'll ban your app" was always weird.

That said, I bet that the real thing they want is the control to be able to push the Twitter Blue premium features, which I'm sure third-party apps would just sideline as much as possible even if they made them all available through the API.

Re: Tweetbot. April 2011 – January 2023

#64
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wouldn't a WeChat type of approach mean encouraging third party clients/integrations/etc?

I don't think so, at least for (mobile) clients, but yes for server-side integrations.

Good point. :)

Re: Tweetbot. April 2011 – January 2023

#65

Another short-sighted and bizarre move by a bizarre. fragile, little man. The number of users on third-party clients could not have been significant enough to justify this. At very least, the developers could have been given some notice or an ounce of respect about API access being phased out. Not to mention third-party client users are mostly power users who are responsible for a lot of the content on Twitter that t…

[flagged]

Re: Tweetbot. April 2011 – January 2023

#66

I don't think they realise the damage this change has done. I have been on board with or ambivalent about most of the changes. I don't care if there's less moderation, I think Twitter probably did have too many employees, and I like the idea of a paid account with fewer (preferably no) ads. I'd even have happily paid Twitter to continue using Tweetbot. But this has destroyed the trust and the user experience of many…

Sidenote, as an Ivory user i'm quite pleased with it. Getting an invite can be a bit challenging, currently. Following @ivory@tapbots.social for invites is how i got mine, fwiw.

edit: https://tapbots.social/@ivory/109683219720510229 though it seems they intend to get Ivory out ASAP due to how this decision has impacted their business. So maybe waiting for Invites won't be needed for long

Re: Tweetbot. April 2011 – January 2023

#67

Everyone is talking about mobile clients, but what about social media companies and businesses that integrated Twitter into their CRMs? At the very least I know businesses that had Twitter directly into their Salesforce, SAP Cloud Integration, and even Teams via Power Automate.

They're unaffected; the ban is specific to replicating the Twitter.com / first-party app experience. Exact wording: "a substitute or similar service or product to the Twitter Applications".

Re: Tweetbot. April 2011 – January 2023

#68
One of the weird things about ignoring dissent and shutting out "haters" is that you lose the opportunity to learn things, things which people who agree with you and "love" you would never tell you to your face. It took me a long time to appreciate that.

When one acts on a world view, untainted by realities that are disliked or fail to penetrate the echo chamber, the results of those actions are never what was expected. Putin attacking Ukraine, Musk buying Twitter, both events provide excellent examples of "reality" not behaving the way the actor wants, and yet to those at a distance with a wider view of things, they seem utterly predictable outcomes.

Re: Tweetbot. April 2011 – January 2023

#69

Another short-sighted and bizarre move by a bizarre. fragile, little man. The number of users on third-party clients could not have been significant enough to justify this. At very least, the developers could have been given some notice or an ounce of respect about API access being phased out. Not to mention third-party client users are mostly power users who are responsible for a lot of the content on Twitter that t…

[flagged]

"Yet you participate in society! Curious!"

Re: Tweetbot. April 2011 – January 2023

#70
post #14

I have an old friend who is blind. The official Twitter client is a LOT less accessible than the one she was using. This change impacts her ability to use Twitter considerably. And before you start with the "well, she's probably better off" -- she lives in a small rural town. Twitter and Facebook and the like are one of her few connections to a larger world.

She's still probably better off, because what happens next to Twitter will continue to be less and less pretty.

The sooner people jump off the ship, the better for each of them.

Post reply on HN