You can't see a photon, but you can taste a proton.
Can a Human See a Single Photon? (1996)
11–20 of 142 posts
Re: Can a Human See a Single Photon? (1996)
#12You can't see a photon, but you can taste a proton.
Is this true or just a pun? Like your acid taste buds are literally sensitive enough to register a single H+ binding?
Fun video by Steve Mould on the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSYE1T5d9jc
Re: Can a Human See a Single Photon? (1996)
#13I’ve been aware of this fact as Feynman points it out in the course of the lectures, but find it totally nuts — there is some sense of scale I’m missing. Matter consists of discrete chunks, atoms, but these chunks are so infinitesimal and numerous that there is no question of seeing them and any effect involving a handful of them is far, far below the human scale. Light also comes in chunks, and the number of these c…
We need 5-9 photons to merit perception. For us to see one atom, we would need 5+ photons to bounce off of that atom directly to our eyeballs in 100ms. Since both these things are so tiny, most photons miss the atom altogether. It's only when you have large numbers of atoms, densely arranged, that conditions create visibility.
Re: Can a Human See a Single Photon? (1996)
#14You can't see a photon, but you can taste a proton.
Re: Can a Human See a Single Photon? (1996)
#15Overview https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2016.20282
The actual work https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms12172
> Here we report that humans can detect a single-photon incident on the cornea with a probability significantly above chance.
Re: Can a Human See a Single Photon? (1996)
#16I’ve been aware of this fact as Feynman points it out in the course of the lectures, but find it totally nuts — there is some sense of scale I’m missing. Matter consists of discrete chunks, atoms, but these chunks are so infinitesimal and numerous that there is no question of seeing them and any effect involving a handful of them is far, far below the human scale. Light also comes in chunks, and the number of these c…
Re: Can a Human See a Single Photon? (1996)
#17You can't see a photon, but you can taste a proton.
Is this true or just a pun? Like your acid taste buds are literally sensitive enough to register a single H+ binding?
Obviously you're not going to be able to taste a single proton in your mouth. But maybe only a very small fraction of those protons are actually interacting with the receptors. Figuring out the threshold on the cellular level would be complex because it would depend on the rate of diffusion of H+ through the relevant channels and the number of relevant channels.
Re: Can a Human See a Single Photon? (1996)
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not 1 but 5-9 photons, still less than billions :) pretty amazing
It’s cool our brains have that as a heuristic for whatever reason. Wonder if you could train yourself to see 1-3?
Re: Can a Human See a Single Photon? (1996)
#19I’ve been aware of this fact as Feynman points it out in the course of the lectures, but find it totally nuts — there is some sense of scale I’m missing. Matter consists of discrete chunks, atoms, but these chunks are so infinitesimal and numerous that there is no question of seeing them and any effect involving a handful of them is far, far below the human scale. Light also comes in chunks, and the number of these c…