Live data from Hacker News

A formula for the nth digit of πœ‹ and πœ‹^n

arxiv.org

141–143 of 143 posts

Re: A formula for the nth digit of πœ‹ and πœ‹^n

#141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The interesting question is: are there real numbers whose N-th digit provably cant be calculated in O(N)?

I don't know of any with practical use, but you can fairly easily define a contrived one: cmeacham98's constant: a number where the `n`th digit is the `2^n`th digit of pi

You're assuming that the N-th digit of pi can't be computed in sub-linear time, no?

Re: A formula for the nth digit of πœ‹ and πœ‹^n

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know of any with practical use, but you can fairly easily define a contrived one: cmeacham98's constant: a number where the `n`th digit is the `2^n`th digit of pi

You're assuming that the N-th digit of pi can't be computed in sub-linear time, no?

Yes, I didn't bother trying to look up if that's 100% proven. If it's not you can just substitute pi for any number where it is provable.

Re: A formula for the nth digit of πœ‹ and πœ‹^n

#143
post #136
post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This sounds like a lot of work, when the physical limit of how many decimal places you need in our universe given the Planck length is only 63 or so.

What do you mean that we β€œonly need” 63 decimal places? A computer can calculate and hold a lot more than 63 digits. So I guess my question is more like: if the universe was just one big computer dedicated only to calculating (and storing) digits of pi, how many digits could it get to calculate, max?

Can you think of a more efficient method than encoding pi onto the spin state of every electron?
Post reply on HN