Earlier quoted context omitted.
> multi pixel imaging of the planet would be required to claim direct observation. Here is an interesting proposal for direct imaging of an exoplanet with 1 km resolution: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.08421 ...and an interesting youtube video about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQFqDKRAROI
It's a cool idea. Unfortunately getting something out to 550 AU and stopping there would take the better part of a century even with advanced technology. And once you're there, you're really stuck in terms of what you can look at. You can only see what's on the other side of the sun, and with an orbital period of 12800 years, it's not like you're going to sweep out much of the sky in a reasonable timeframe.
Wolf 1069B: Earth-mass planet in the habitable zone of a nearby, low-mass star
131–132 of 132 posts
Re: Wolf 1069B: Earth-mass planet in the habitable zone of a nearby, low-mass star
#13215 day orbit, 170 day planetary rotation, that's an interesting one Sucks for the amount of radiation ofc Would be interesting to hypothesize of it being a larger mercury like planet than a earth like one Please some more up to date astro-duders out there, is the James Webb currently capable of direct spectrography of exoplanets? We can do spectrography during the transit I am aware, but direct spectrography, is that…
Could be a non problem depending on the atmosphere
That's why I mentioned the hypothesized mercury situation, as mercury has got a very thin mantle and its core is VERY outsided, so it has got a very strong magnetic field. This is consequence of likely early solar system crash, Mercury might just be the core remnants of a planetary collision elsewhere
But yeah, this rock wont have athmosphere