>but it also seriously limits his chances of finding employment as a programmer. That doesn't sound quite right. TOO HOT FOR FACEBOOK!!! could look great on the right résumé. The whole thing is just what we've come to expect from facebook by now tbh.
True, but it does suck to be banned from the ubiquitous platform in which you've spent time becoming highly specialized. edit: Apparently he developed a browser plugin that doesn't use Facebook's API, so it looks like this may actually be a decent endorsement.
Facebook intimidates developer, bans him and his code for life
31–40 of 87 posts
Re: Facebook intimidates developer, bans him and his code for life
#32I would hire him
Re: Facebook intimidates developer, bans him and his code for life
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
The fact that 1. a developer could create a working product that is live and used by a lot of users. 2. a developer could create something that draws a significant attention from a huge company like facebook since it turns out that the product has significant impact that it's actually all over the news when facebook tries to limit it. These to me would not be a strong reason for hurting a chance of employment. On the…
These things can bite you when you least expect them. Say you hired him to write a web app and later on the users (or investors, or clients) want to have FB login. Now you need to fire the guy or separate him from the FB login implementation, testing, and use. The guy's got a huge target mark on his ass.
Re: Facebook intimidates developer, bans him and his code for life
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
The fact that 1. a developer could create a working product that is live and used by a lot of users. 2. a developer could create something that draws a significant attention from a huge company like facebook since it turns out that the product has significant impact that it's actually all over the news when facebook tries to limit it. These to me would not be a strong reason for hurting a chance of employment. On the…
These things can bite you when you least expect them. Say you hired him to write a web app and later on the users (or investors, or clients) want to have FB login. Now you need to fire the guy or separate him from the FB login implementation, testing, and use. The guy's got a huge target mark on his ass.
Re: Facebook intimidates developer, bans him and his code for life
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
Employers often do background checks and if they find out he was banned by Facebook that may work against him.
How do employers find out the ban? I thought it's a private matter. Does Facebook have a list of all banned developers?
Re: Facebook intimidates developer, bans him and his code for life
#36He wasn't "banned for life". He received a "cease and desist" letter from Facebook's lawyer that threatened (bluffed) to escalate their challenge against the game. It's classic scare tactic employed by lawyers for unethical clients.
He quotes "I must cease and not access the Facebook site(s) and/or services for any reason whatsoever." There is not EOL date in his statement.
Re: Facebook intimidates developer, bans him and his code for life
#37There is a little more on this here:
http://blog.games.com/2012/01/06/facebook-friendly-gaming-si...
"...the plug-in had racked up an impressive following of players "in-the-know," who kept the project a secret for fear of such an outcome..."
Maybe such a plugin shouldn't be disallowed by Facebook but it seems like it wasn't surprising to many people that it was...
Re: Facebook intimidates developer, bans him and his code for life
#38Section 3.2:
"You will not collect users' content or information, or otherwise access Facebook, using automated means (such as harvesting bots, robots, spiders, or scrapers) without our permission."
Seems writing a bot that automatically takes actions on a user's behalf would clearly violate the Facebook terms.
Banning bots is perfectly reasonable behaviour for any site, a badly written bot, especially one that's distributed to large numbers of users could very easily cause a denial-of-service attack because of sloppy programming.
Facebook probably should have just dropped the developer a friendly email rather than a letter from their lawyers and banning the developer might be going over-far, but there's nothing wrong with them wanting to ban the plugin.
Re: Facebook intimidates developer, bans him and his code for life
#39Re: Facebook intimidates developer, bans him and his code for life
#40I have a question which is more legal related. It is "public" secret that US government (and other governments) have and use persona management softwares which clearly violate Facebook terms of usage. The question is: does Facebook has any legal standing against that? Can Facebook or other social networks sue government for offering private intelligence companies contracts to create software to manage "fake people"?