Live data from Hacker News

Recent improvements to Safari

magiclasso.co

101–110 of 147 posts

Re: Recent improvements to Safari

#101

I love how Safari fills in OTP codes from SMS messages automatically. I know you’re not supposed to use them but so many services still do.

Would you be ok with the mailman going through your letters and handing you the PIN code for your amex on a post-it note? "Saved you opening it yourself."

This only works with OTP codes formatted in a specified way so the system can make sure it’s only suggesting OTP codes and only on the website they are intended for.

https://wicg.github.io/sms-one-time-codes/

Re: Recent improvements to Safari

#103
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That role belongs to Chrome, half of their stuff isn't even a Web standard.

Chrome is not the the weakest / furthest behind major browser

That only reveals a lack understanding how IE 5 took over the Web world.

It slowed down when it won, same will happen to Chrome after Google is done turning it into ChromeOS.

Safari is the only relevant browser preventing Google to achieve that goal.

Re: Recent improvements to Safari

#104
post #56
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Except the data linked in the article proves the exact opposite?

Sssh, the world is filled with people who just think that if chrome does it, it’s correct, and that if chrome doesn’t do it, it doesn’t matter, and that if a site works in chrome then every other browser is wrong. Completely unlike the old IE developers.

[deleted]

Re: Recent improvements to Safari

#105
post #35

Safari is the new IE6. It's always going to be the weakest / furthest behind major browser.

Anyone who disagrees hasn't tried to develop a website on Chrome and Firefox only to find out Safari still doesn't support regex lookbehind (which means zero javascript will now run). It's only been available in Chrome for 5 years after all, no rush.

None of your Jacascript code will run? That sounds overly dramatic. 1. this only concerns regex 2. there’s an alternative regex syntax doing the same thing as part of the ecma standard 3. it can be implemented very easily without regex in almost all cases 3. It seems like you’re only considering chrome for desktop, not other browsers or mobile

Re: Recent improvements to Safari

#106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can't do proper adblocking (e.g. uBlock Origin) on Safari. That's why I don't really use it except when on battery and out travelling - and even then I'll often avoid using Safari since ads are so awful. Yes, I've tried the Safari adblockers, they suck. As far as I can tell they do marginally more at best than a DNS block. Once you can't use uBlock Origin with Chrome due to the proposed Manifest V3, Firefox will…

As the author of the linked article, there's over 250,000 users of our Safari-exclusive ad blocker[1] with few complaints. It is able to block all ads, trackers and annoyances that users encounter. Including all YouTube ads. Don't disagree that there are some limitations with more contemporary ad blocking approaches but they do the job for most users needs. These approaches will likely continue to evolve and include…

Tried your app and it had some of the worst dark patterns experience I've yet seen on iOS.

If it's not a scam it at least works hard to appear as a scam.

Re: Recent improvements to Safari

#107

I don't really know about all the details of those metrics but I know one thing: Safari is smooth. Actually it was just perfect in the previous years too for me anyway. It just works and works super-efficient. That's why I use it. The only reason I have Chrome installed is to test my websites with Chrome and use MetaMask. TBH I never understood why people use Chrome on a Mac unless there is a specific extension or si…

You can't do proper adblocking (e.g. uBlock Origin) on Safari. That's why I don't really use it except when on battery and out travelling - and even then I'll often avoid using Safari since ads are so awful. Yes, I've tried the Safari adblockers, they suck. As far as I can tell they do marginally more at best than a DNS block. Once you can't use uBlock Origin with Chrome due to the proposed Manifest V3, Firefox will…

There is also Brave, which has its own rust-based adblocker, that's not dependent on the extension API.

Re: Recent improvements to Safari

#108

This is what antitrust regulation can do at its finest; when we had a draft for DMA, it was clear to everyone that Apple cannot block third party browser engine forever. MS has surrendered to Blink and Mozilla is getting irrelevant. So if Apple insists to drive everyone to the App Store ecosystem instead of the Web then Blink will take over the entire browser engine market sooner or later. Which is really bad for cus…

So if Apple “is driving everyone to the App Store instead of the web” and Android browsers are so much better, then why do companies waste time making Android apps instead of telling Android users to just use the web?

How many companies are making iOS apps and not Android apps and telling Android users to just use the web?

Re: Recent improvements to Safari

#109
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed! I don’t know why anyone would want that. And even Apple is getting bad with their own notifications. I just got one from Apple Music yesterday about the Super Bowl. WTF? I had to turn off Notifications for that now, too.

It's not that websites will now send you notifications. It's that PWAs will now have the option to ask to send you notifications in the same way any other app on your iPhone does. It means people can start developing apps for the web that will basically work on any platform that can run a browser. A huge step forward for the web platform that has so far been stunted by Apple's unwillingness to support these web stand…

And yet almost every site that asks for notifications do if exclusively to spam you.

Re: Recent improvements to Safari

#110
post #94
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So bizarre that there are devs think we want webpages with the ability to spam them. Literally the last thing I want from a random website is notification spams and pop up, but woooooo soon I guess I’ll have to get used to pop ups asking me to receive ads from websites all over again.

Let's say you write an email client as a web app. Or a twitter client. Or perhaps an encrypted voice telephony webapp. Of course it is important for them to deliver notifications for those who want to receive them. This isn't about regular web pages that want to annoy you.

And if I am using an encrypted telephony app, I want it to integrate with the native phone dialer, recent messages, etc. I also want it to behave like a phone call when my phone is paired to my car using Bluetooth. All of my third party calling apps do that now.
Post reply on HN