Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI starts testing ChatGPT premium

businesstoday.in

111–120 of 333 posts

Re: OpenAI starts testing ChatGPT premium

#111
post #32

My son asked if which of two animals would win in a fight and we just got a lecture about how fighting is bad. I hope they’ll give an option to turn off what I’m calling “hall monitor mode” That could be worth paying for.

Yeah, I have a product that rewrites content under a persona.

I wanted to take the persona (a plain English description of how someone communicates) and generate a headshot to go with it for the UI. So I asked ChatGPT to describe what the persona looks like as if they were talking to a sketch artist.

Instead of getting something I could feed into DallE, I got a lecture about stereotyping.

Re: OpenAI starts testing ChatGPT premium

#112

Curious what others would pay/if anyone else signed the form? I'd pay like $10/mo I think. Possibly more if there were no censorship/limitations (it had access to internet browsing, and I could direct it to URL's for information and whatnot). I pay that for Copilot right now, which I feel is easily worth $50/mo. (I don't use ChatGPT that much, it'd need to be ingrained in my IDE workflow)

$200

Re: OpenAI starts testing ChatGPT premium

#113
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As a commercial entity in the western world they have to appease the social justice warriors or face getting deplatformed and hit with a smear campaign. Don't hold your breath. The unrestricted models will come from China.

Weird how hard you've bought into the right-wing narratives

I don't follow any narratives, I don't follow anyone, and I don't read the news (except this site).

Re: OpenAI starts testing ChatGPT premium

#114
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> with disabled watermarking What does that mean in this context?

I believe ChatGPT inserts invisible characters that watermark the text. I'm sure it isn't hard to remove them via some third party tool

No, this is utterly false. They were looking into doing watermarking using things like character frequency, choice of words, etc (it would effect the content itself). But it isn't implemented yet and something like inviable characters would be trivial to bypass

Re: OpenAI starts testing ChatGPT premium

#115

“However, ever since the chatbot has come into action, it has been negatively impacting students' learning.” This sentence is out of nowhere, did ChatGPT write this article? How could someone think something so new is suddenly negatively impacting students across the board.

I believe this is going to transform the way people learn. Instead of learning in a structured they are going to learn exactly what they need.

You don't need to know about physics molecules until you face a task related to it. And ChatGPT can direct you to learn more about it.

I am in my bachelor's right now and I see how I can skip a lot of knowledge regarding some low-level computer science skills until I really need them. And at the moment if I can't go further without learning how to effectively optimize ML algorithms using CPP I will hear from ChatGPT that I need to go that way. Otherwise: skip. It is not good enough to provide a whole curriculum for sure. But it is sufficient to get directions to which parts I need to learn.

The education is going to be transformed into "tree" | "unstructured" | "NoSQL" instead of a clumsy set of blocks everybody needs to go through.

This is my opinion

Re: OpenAI starts testing ChatGPT premium

#116
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> with disabled watermarking What does that mean in this context?

I believe ChatGPT inserts invisible characters that watermark the text. I'm sure it isn't hard to remove them via some third party tool

If I paste an answer into a hex editor, there isn't anything suspicious. All space chars are 0x20, all characters are normal ASCII. I think no watermarking is taking place.

Re: OpenAI starts testing ChatGPT premium

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dramatically improving my learning. The ability to ask questions & ask for examples has helped me learn far faster than books, videos, blogs, etc. Yes, I know the information isn't always 100% accurate. Neither are the books, blogs, courses, etc., I pay for. They also don't let me ask "what about this scenario..." This gives me such a strong base to build from which I can then use other sources to verify.

> Yes, I know the information isn't always 100% accurate. Neither are the books, blogs, courses, etc., I pay for Those are two completely different things. ChatGPT has no obligation to be correct, and isn't even trying! It is a chatbot. Its prime directive is only to sound believable . Those books, blogs, courses, etc are at least trying to be correct and provide you with reliable information on a topic. Try using Ch…

I'm using chatgpt as a coach for my programming learning path and honestly, it's amazing.

My bootcamp Discord feels useless in comparison. ChatGPT is always available, and while it's true sometimes gives beliable but wrong answers in my experience if you have basic knowledge on the topic it's easy to spot.

It saves me sooooo much time it's amazing. The time I spent correcting or figuring out ChatGPT mistakes is minuscule in comparison of the time I'd be spending scanning horrible documentation or testing stuff from Stack Overflow.

And if you feel it doesn't provide useful answers, then just and use your search engine.

Re: OpenAI starts testing ChatGPT premium

#118
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is a five alarm fire at every university I have a line into. As in, “it’s time to radically rethink your entire course” kind of fire. I don’t think it’s bad, per se, but ChatGPT has effectively made it pointless to do certain kinds of assignments now. A lot of professors have been teaching the same way for many years. It’s a reckoning.

I attended a prestigious university. You could pretty much do what you liked (including nothing) for the three years and the degree was awarded for 30 hours of exams in a single week. In the exam room you couldn't copy work or pay someone else to do it or consult a chatbot. You knew the subject or you didn't. So you don't have to change the teaching. You could change the examining.

Yep, back to exams, which there was never anything wrong with in the first place, IMO.

Re: OpenAI starts testing ChatGPT premium

#119

“However, ever since the chatbot has come into action, it has been negatively impacting students' learning.” This sentence is out of nowhere, did ChatGPT write this article? How could someone think something so new is suddenly negatively impacting students across the board.

Humans tend to not like change, particularly in institutions that are themselves resistant to change. Education today is very much like the education in the early 1900s - designed to educate a compliant workforce who would work in factories. Neat rows of desks lined up before an authority.

Wide availability of these tools will create a new "AI Native" generation. What this will do I don't know. Some effects will be good, some bad.

Narrowing to just me, I find the real value I get while learning is asking questions along the lines of "is this concept like this other concept that I know?" When I get an affirmative, then ChatGPT often goes on to tell me something else that I didn't know. These kinds of interactions are very valuable to me. Example from last night in the middle of a long chat:

"How is the query representation computed? Also, is the dot product between the query and key representations similar to computing the cosine similarity between two vectors?"

"The query representation is typically computed by applying a linear transformation to the hidden states of the input words, often represented as vectors. This linear transformation is typically implemented as a fully connected layer, or a matrix multiplication, followed by a non-linear activation function, such as a ReLU. The resulting query representation vector has the same dimension as the hidden state, and it's used to measure the similarity between the word and the other words in the input sequence.

The dot product between the query and key representations is similar to computing the cosine similarity between two vectors. The cosine similarity is a measure of the similarity between two vectors in a multi-dimensional space, and is defined as the dot product of the vectors normalized by their magnitudes.

The dot product of the query and key representations can be seen as an un-normalized version of the cosine similarity, in the sense that it computes the dot product of the two vectors. The result is a scalar value, which represents the similarity between the two vectors, the larger the scalar, the more similar the vectors are.

The dot product, however, is just one way of computing the similarity, other similarity measure, like the euclidean distance, the L1 norm, or even other more sophisticated similarity measures can also be used. The choice of similarity measure depends on the task and the model architecture, also the dot product has the advantage of being computationally efficient, which is important when dealing with large scale models like transformer based models."

Re: OpenAI starts testing ChatGPT premium

#120
post #66
post #32

My son asked if which of two animals would win in a fight and we just got a lecture about how fighting is bad. I hope they’ll give an option to turn off what I’m calling “hall monitor mode” That could be worth paying for.

I'm with you since it gets in the way when you actually want to do something, but I had quite a lot of fun trying to circumvent the hall monitor mode. There's something silly and pleasurable in tricking ChatGPT to do something it doesn't want to. And there are so many ways to achieve it too. My current challenge that I cannot manage to complete is to convince ChatGPT to accept being called Geppetto.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN