Live data from Hacker News

Europe's largest deposit of rare earth metals discovered in Sweden

news.cision.com

231–240 of 341 posts

Re: Europe's largest deposit of rare earth metals discovered in Sweden

#231

Not exactly surprising that it’s in Sweden, as many rare earth metals were first discovered here and are named after Swedish things: - Scandium from Scandinavia - Yttrium, Terbium, Erbium and Ytterbium from the village of Ytterby - Holmium from Stockholm - Thulium from Thule

Also, Tungsten.

Annoyingly, even though tungsten literally means "heavy stone" in Swedish, the name of the element in Swedish is "volfram".

Re: Europe's largest deposit of rare earth metals discovered in Sweden

#232
post #203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> nobody ever had a complaint about gold, silver, platinum or diamond mining In what world? NGOs, academics, journalists, and non-profits have been speaking out about these and the blood diamond industries around them for decades at least > Gold mining is one of the most destructive industries in the world. It can displace communities, contaminate drinking water, hurt workers, and destroy pristine environments https:…

I know there's a "clique" criticizing this. That's not my point, but thanks for trying to balance the needle on its tip. Ask common people and the media about gold, silver and platinum mining, and you'll get a careless shrug on the shoulders in return.

Wouldn't 'most people' also shrug if you mentioned mining of rare earth minerals? I don't think there is a distinction except 'most people' know what gold and diamonds and platinum are.

Re: Europe's largest deposit of rare earth metals discovered in Sweden

#234

> If we look at how other permit processes have worked within our industry, it will be at least 10-15 years... When it takes 15 years simply to get permission to do something, you know that your country will never be competitive globally. Either the benefits outweigh the downsides, or vice versa. A group of 10 of the right experts ought to be able to decide that in a week. Spending 15 years paper-pushing, doing court…

[flagged]

Re: Europe's largest deposit of rare earth metals discovered in Sweden

#235
post #206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

None of those used in solar panels are lanthanides. Current EVs use some lanthanides in magnets (soon to be displaced, as noted), but not in the batteries. Permanent magnets are used mainly in the smallest wind turbines, where offshore turbines are the biggest.

I see. I didn't realize "rare earth minerals" had a specific chemical definition

"Rare-earth" means lanthanides plus scandium and yttrium. But scandium and yttrium are not used in magnets, so they would confuse people less by saying "lanthanide magnet" instead of "rare-earth magnet".

Re: Europe's largest deposit of rare earth metals discovered in Sweden

#236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's important to understand that electrification does not reduce pollution.

Depends on two things 1) what is being electrified - it’s not just about cars and 2) how the power is generated.

Also 3) the pollution created by unrecyclable end use electronic devices of all sizes.

Re: Europe's largest deposit of rare earth metals discovered in Sweden

#237
post #203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> nobody ever had a complaint about gold, silver, platinum or diamond mining In what world? NGOs, academics, journalists, and non-profits have been speaking out about these and the blood diamond industries around them for decades at least > Gold mining is one of the most destructive industries in the world. It can displace communities, contaminate drinking water, hurt workers, and destroy pristine environments https:…

I know there's a "clique" criticizing this. That's not my point, but thanks for trying to balance the needle on its tip. Ask common people and the media about gold, silver and platinum mining, and you'll get a careless shrug on the shoulders in return.

I don't think academics, journalists, and NGOs formulate a "clique". I think the matter is just those that are informed and those that aren't. The simple fact of the matter is most people simply aren't aware of the environmental and ethical impacts of the production of our everyday electronics.

I really doubt more people are aware/making noise about rare earth minerals as they have been about the impacts of the sort of mining used to get gold, silver, etc

Re: Europe's largest deposit of rare earth metals discovered in Sweden

#238

Isn't rare earth metals mining insanely pollutive? I've heard they can be found all over the world but only China mines them massively because nobody else is willing to destroy their ecology.

It certainly depends on the industrial process as a whole. But it's worth pointing out that nobody ever had a complaint about gold, silver, platinum or diamond mining, nor about the unimaginable volumes of ore processed to acquire iron and copper. But somehow these days everyone likes to think that they know that rare earth metals are "the devil".

Diamond mining is absolutely idiotic. We can grow them in a lab without any problems. And so much of them that we can put them on angle grinders and sell them at ordinary hardware stores.

So why would anyone want a "real" diamond these days? Engagement/wedding ring is just not the same if it's made without spilling some poor African's blood or something?

Re: Europe's largest deposit of rare earth metals discovered in Sweden

#239
post #215
post #200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "Rare-earths" are not, incidentally, needed for electric vehicles, wind turbines, or solar panels, however much certain people wish they were, or confidently claim. What exactly does this mean? EVs use a ton more rare earth minerals than conventional cars https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/minerals-used... Solar panels use silicon, indium, gallium, selenium, cadmium, and tellurium. Neodymium and dyspros…

The graph you linked shows that this is not true. See the tiny purple graph at the right side of the bar? That's the rare earth minerals and their amount in an electric car is tiny.

Isn't 0.5kg per vehicle a lot for rare earth minerals?? Sure it looks tiny compared to the amount of copper, nickel, manganese, etc used, but the whole point is that they're rare...

0.5kg of neodymium is around $200 and it's probably the cheapest of the rare earths

0.5kg of europium is around $3,750

Obviously lots of variation there, but maybe ratio of how much it costs vs the total cost of all the other minerals is a better metric to use here than pure weight

Re: Europe's largest deposit of rare earth metals discovered in Sweden

#240

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It certainly depends on the industrial process as a whole. But it's worth pointing out that nobody ever had a complaint about gold, silver, platinum or diamond mining, nor about the unimaginable volumes of ore processed to acquire iron and copper. But somehow these days everyone likes to think that they know that rare earth metals are "the devil".

Gold, silver, and platinum are largely by products of zinc mining etc in recent decades.

Fun fact: 0.16% of global zinc mined in 2020 went to making US pennies.

Source: 7,596,400,000 pennies made @ 2.5g each divided by 12.1Mt worldwide zinc production.

Post reply on HN