DDR3-1333 DRAM = 10.6GB/sec
I'll have the grain of salt, please.
11–20 of 27 posts
DDR3-1333 DRAM = 10.6GB/sec
I'll have the grain of salt, please.
Steve Wozniak is a true hacker. Kudos for the achievement.
Is there any evidence that Woz did anything here?
http://www.fusionio.com/press/Steve-Wozniak-Joins-Fusion-io-...
1 billion 64-byte IOPS = 64GB/sec DDR3-1333 DRAM = 10.6GB/sec I'll have the grain of salt, please.
1 billion 64-byte IOPS = 64GB/sec DDR3-1333 DRAM = 10.6GB/sec I'll have the grain of salt, please.
So "only" 7.5GB/sec (125,000,000 * 64 / 1024^3), or about 60Gbit/s per server, with 16 modules per server. Still fairly respectable by storage standards, at about ten times the theoretical max for SATA III of 6Gbit/s.
Does anyone know what this improvement actually is? The article makes it sound like their card is doing DMA to pinned user allocations, but that doesn't sound too revolutionary. I know next to nothing about storage controllers, but see the last many years of high-speed networking for an entire ecosystem based around that concept.
OS bypass hasn't really been done for storage, so that's new in some sense.
Compared to an SSD that does 100,000 IOPS.
Each card seems to be a dual unit, not taking this into account as some SSD pci cards are also like this.
So it apparently makes their custom flash storage behave like RAM, and provides an API to OS and software developers to make use of it as such, but it's non-volatile, so everything persists in the case of power failure or reboot. Here's an informative quote from Wozniak from the press release: " Instead of treating flash like storage, where data passes through all of the OS kernel subsystems that were built and optim…