Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites
kristall.random-projects.net
Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites
1–10 of 198 posts
Re: Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites
#2A browser^, at a minimum, should support HTML + CSS (+1 if it supports the latest specification).
Edit: ^A modern browser
Re: Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites
#3A browser^, at a minimum, should support HTML + CSS (+1 if it supports the latest specification). Edit : ^A modern browser
That seems like an overly narrow definition of what a browser "should" be. I think there's enough choice that niche projects like this can exist.
Re: Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites
#4A browser^, at a minimum, should support HTML + CSS (+1 if it supports the latest specification). Edit : ^A modern browser
By that definition, many screen reader browsers would not be considered browsers yet they enable the user to surf the web none the less.
Re: Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites
#5A browser^, at a minimum, should support HTML + CSS (+1 if it supports the latest specification). Edit : ^A modern browser
By that definition, many screen reader browsers would not be considered browsers yet they enable the user to surf the web none the less.
That’s not how a screen reader works. It interfaces with a “normal” browser’s exposed accessibility tree, and generates speech / Braille from that.
Re: Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites
#6A browser^, at a minimum, should support HTML + CSS (+1 if it supports the latest specification). Edit : ^A modern browser
Agree. This cool project should be called "a user agent", not a browser.
Re: Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites
#7kristall is along with geminaut and lagrange, the perfect triptych for wandering the small web! until recently they were the only ones to pass (almost) torture tests [1]! highly recommended
[1] gemini://gemini.conman.org/test/torture/
Re: Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites
#8Like Lynx then?
Re: Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites
#9A browser^, at a minimum, should support HTML + CSS (+1 if it supports the latest specification). Edit : ^A modern browser
...a browser for what ? Kristall is (near) perfect, for its work
Re: Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites
#10Like Lynx then?