Live data from Hacker News

An engineer has built and programmed an all-robot band

guitarworld.com

11–20 of 72 posts

Re: An engineer has built and programmed an all-robot band

#13

Is “robot” overused these days? Headline: “Engineer builds robotic lawn care system” Reality: A programable sprinkler valve timer.

In this case these are more like machines that play instruments than what most “common folk” would consider a robot.

This is certainly an interesting creation but for some reason the lack of sensors or some ability to respond to what it is doing or it’s environment seems to fall short of “robot”.

Re: An engineer has built and programmed an all-robot band

#14
Reminds me of Electromancy: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9tBkb9DJTrA

From the channel description:

> I’m a disabled musician building a robot metal band to keep playing music. DIY robot instruments, broken manikin bandmates. Creative mind of Step "Satyra" Tranovich

Re: An engineer has built and programmed an all-robot band

#17
Pat Metheny has done something similar with his orchestrion project, 12 years ago (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsYEOUKS4Yk). At the time I went to see him perform with it in the Concertgebouw in Amsterdam, which was impressive, but still missing the band energy that normally makes the music come alive. He did mention that it was the first gig on the tour without major technical issues, it does seem like a nightmare to set it all up correctly.

Re: An engineer has built and programmed an all-robot band

#19
post #17

Pat Metheny has done something similar with his orchestrion project, 12 years ago ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsYEOUKS4Yk ). At the time I went to see him perform with it in the Concertgebouw in Amsterdam, which was impressive, but still missing the band energy that normally makes the music come alive. He did mention that it was the first gig on the tour without major technical issues, it does seem like a night…

[deleted]

Re: An engineer has built and programmed an all-robot band

#20

Is “robot” overused these days? Headline: “Engineer builds robotic lawn care system” Reality: A programable sprinkler valve timer.

In this case these are more like machines that play instruments than what most “common folk” would consider a robot. This is certainly an interesting creation but for some reason the lack of sensors or some ability to respond to what it is doing or it’s environment seems to fall short of “robot”.

If we constantly have to change our technical terms to fit whatever misconceptions the "common folk" have... well that's a lot of pointless redefinition and recoining.
Post reply on HN