Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oof. My electronics stopped before GCSEs, and even I know about 555s. I can believe someone might prefer software for prototyping, but manufacturing? Well, I've seen prototypes enter production, so yes, but still, ugh .
A attiny might not make sense, but you can get something like the PMS150C for around ~5ct, where it makes more sense to use a single MCU than a 555 with all the extra needed BOM Items.
Taking over a Dead IoT Company
121–130 of 213 posts
Re: Taking over a Dead IoT Company
#122> With full control of the domain, we can create a new API based on what the sign is expecting and revive all of the signs that are out in the field. Once the new server was up, did any signs from the field connect to it?
Good question! No signs connected to the server until I reached out to some other sign owners to try out my instructions.
Re: Taking over a Dead IoT Company
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
This makes me wonder how Tidbyt's business is doing. They seem to have a fair amount of employees. I actually built something very similar and all in my spare time. I've been wondering how realistic making a side-business out of it is, but if you are a single engineer that has to code the firmware, server, build the displays and market it all... it's pretty tough (especially in your spare time).
We actually only have 4 FTE's today and our business is both sustainable and growing. Our scale is also a couple orders of magnitude larger than the numbers from the article, and we have much better control over our BOM. Hardware is a tough business and managing cash flow & inventory requires you to be a lot more deliberate than a pure SaaS business. Fortunately we had a lot of examples going in of how not to do thin…
Re: Taking over a Dead IoT Company
#124Re: Taking over a Dead IoT Company
#125I didn’t quite understand the need for an injection attack. Once you had bought the domain and could respond to the devices‘ API calls, weren’t you in the driving seat already?
I actually had written more about the exploit & vulnerability in my original drafts but I cut it out because it was a bit boring to read. You are correct that with domain control I am able to serve content to any sign but the content will only be loaded once at boot time. Any future updates would have needed to come from their defunct AWS IoT connection (ignoring full restarts). Using the exploit I remove the connect…
Re: Taking over a Dead IoT Company
#126In 2020 I set out to build something very similar[0]. This was before I even knew NYCTrainSign existed. I started with zero electronics knowledge and learned a lot. My prototype has been running solidly for way over a year and while I've always hoped I would be able to turn it into an actual product I could sell... doing so proved challenging. Really what blocked me the most was CE/FCC conformance. I have done a lot…
https://www.instagram.com/p/BVAIWfGBARk/ my problem was squeezing the MTA API parser into the ESP32 flash... as long as you use off-the-shelf / already conforming modules, like the esp wroom etc, the cost for FCC compliance testing goes down into the thousands. it's still a line item, but over a run of 1000-2000 units, it turns into something that costs about a buck per board :)
Ahh, I wouldn't do that. The way I've done it is by pushing as much of the API handling logic off the ESP32 and onto a standalone server. The ESP32 is effectively a dumb client which takes in instructions like "WRITE westminster 5 min" from the server and draws the appropriate text/pixels/etc.
> as long as you use off-the-shelf / already conforming modules, like the esp wroom etc, the cost for FCC compliance testing goes down into the thousands. it's still a line item, but over a run of 1000-2000 units, it turns into something that costs about a buck per board :)
yeah... it's $1 per board unless none of your boards sell :)
Re: Taking over a Dead IoT Company
#127I build something similar https://sschueller.github.io/posts/vbz-fahrgastinformation/ but with way less BOM and I keep getting asked that I should sell them. The primary reason I don't is because I don't want to support something like that for the next 10 years...
heh, same. I built a little custom sign for my airbnb. Part of my home automation system: https://imgur.com/a/8A5IKV6
Re: Taking over a Dead IoT Company
#128Woof. Adafruit + Raspberry Pi in a shipped product screams to me that they did not have a real electronics guy on their team. https://ukdepartureboards.co.uk/ is the British equivalent of this, and it seems to do everything right (don’t own one, but have seen on Twitter)- optional subscription, and nice looking hardware (seems like they contracted out for that). Though at the minute I suppose there are barely any tra…
Re: Taking over a Dead IoT Company
#129A few years ago I created something similar for the London Tube although it was much more crude, just a pi zero and a strip of RGB LED lights that represented the colours of the tube lines. The store that made the LED strip caught wind of it some how and they cut out a wooden enclosure for me to put the thing in, with the tube line names etched into the wood, which completely blew me away. My dad kept on telling me a…
Re: Taking over a Dead IoT Company
#130In 2020 I set out to build something very similar[0]. This was before I even knew NYCTrainSign existed. I started with zero electronics knowledge and learned a lot. My prototype has been running solidly for way over a year and while I've always hoped I would be able to turn it into an actual product I could sell... doing so proved challenging. Really what blocked me the most was CE/FCC conformance. I have done a lot…