Show HN: Socketify.py: Http/Https and WebSockets servers for PyPy3 and Python3

Post by onedognight » Tue, Jan 10, 2023, 2:34 PM UTC

xwowsersx wrote: post #91

onedognight wrote: post #70

The “src/“ directory[0] contains compiled .so files. Is this even open source? [0] https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py/tree/main/src/s...

Hmm... there's Python and CPP. src/socketify ├── __init__.py ├── __main__.py ├── asgi.py ├── cli.py ├── helpers.py ├── libsocketify_darwin_amd64.so ├── libsocketify_darwin_arm64.so ├── libsocketify_linux_amd64.so ├── libsocketify_windows_amd64.dll ├── loop.py ├── native │ ├── Make.bat │ ├── Makefile │ ├── src │ │ ├── libsocketify.cpp │ │ └── libsocketify.h │ └── uv_selector.txt ├── native.py ├── socketify.py ├── ssgi…

Post by kaba0 » Tue, Jan 10, 2023, 2:35 PM UTC

cirospaciari wrote: post #5

div72 wrote: post #3

Probably should add that it's faster with PyPy as it might not be obvious on how an interpreted language like Python can beat an AOT compiled language like Go. Interesting results nevertheless.

Yeah, I'm converting to HPy and it probably will be faster in CPython too, but like you said AOT is hard to beet without JIT at least. But with CPython is faster than Golang Gin :D

Post by cirospaciari » Tue, Jan 10, 2023, 2:38 PM UTC

onedognight wrote: post #101

xwowsersx wrote: post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hmm... there's Python and CPP. src/socketify ├── __init__.py ├── __main__.py ├── asgi.py ├── cli.py ├── helpers.py ├── libsocketify_darwin_amd64.so ├── libsocketify_darwin_arm64.so ├── libsocketify_linux_amd64.so ├── libsocketify_windows_amd64.dll ├── loop.py ├── native │ ├── Make.bat │ ├── Makefile │ ├── src │ │ ├── libsocketify.cpp │ │ └── libsocketify.h │ └── uv_selector.txt ├── native.py ├── socketify.py ├── ssgi…

Ah, thanks! In my defense, the native/ directory contains the portable C++ source and the src/ directory contains a the native executables.

Post by [deleted] » Tue, Jan 10, 2023, 2:38 PM UTC

Thaxll wrote: post #58

Since we're in the useless benchmark, this Go native library completely wreck any C/C++ lib wrapped by Python: https://github.com/panjf2000/gnet It is as fast as the fastest C++ / Rust implementation.

Post by cirospaciari » Tue, Jan 10, 2023, 2:39 PM UTC

kaba0 wrote: post #103

cirospaciari wrote: post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, I'm converting to HPy and it probably will be faster in CPython too, but like you said AOT is hard to beet without JIT at least. But with CPython is faster than Golang Gin :D

Graal JIT often beats Graal AOT in the Java “universe”.